talk-ch

talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch

5 participants
2233 discussions

Re: [talk-ch] Corrupt buildings
by Kt47uo5uVzW 26 Jul '18

26 Jul '18

Check this: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61021881 No I'm not involved in any kind of this import/region. Regards marc marc: > Hello, > > Le 25. 07. 18 à 00:25, Kt47uo5uVzW a écrit : >> I think the latest changesets from user 'naoliv' are erroneous. >> Can somewhere check and maybe revert this? Thanks. > > can you give an exemple ? > naoliv redact (hidde) data copied from Fribourg cadastre > (the licence of the canton of Fribourg doesn't allow it). > so a building should not be corrupted by this redact > but it should be already corrupt before. > > are you the guy that did the import ? > > Regards, > Marc > _______________________________________________ > talk-ch mailing list > talk-ch(a)openstreetmap.ch > http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch >

7 14

Re: [talk-ch] Does a fountain flow rate/discharge property exist?
by marc marc 25 Jul '18

25 Jul '18

Le 24. 07. 18 à 17:15, Marc M. a écrit : > 2018-07-24 8:12 GMT+02:00 Matthew Moy de Vitry <matthew.mdv(a)gmail.com>: >> the flow rate of fountains > > flow_rate "created" for fire hydrant look like fine also for a fountain > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant sorry for the delay. I also see some "drinking_water:description Quellwasser" it look like that the meaning is water_source=spring

2 1

Corrupt buildings
by Kt47uo5uVzW 24 Jul '18

24 Jul '18

Hi I think the latest changesets from user 'naoliv' are erroneous. Can somewhere check and maybe revert this? Thanks. (Maybe this mail will be a duplicate, because I had troubles with subscription to the list)

2 1

Does a fountain flow rate/discharge property exist?
by Matthew Moy de Vitry 24 Jul '18

24 Jul '18

Hello, For the beta.water-fountains.org project, I want to add a property to indicate the flow rate of fountains. In wikidata, this could possibly be done with the "discharge <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P2225>" property, which is currently used for rivers. I am wondering if a similar property exists in OSM. Thanks! Matthew -- Matthew

3 3

addr:suburb in Bern
by Selfish Seahorse 23 Jul '18

23 Jul '18

Hallo Mir ist aufgefallen, dass in Bern viele Adressen ein addr:suburb-Tag [^1] besitzen (z. B. addr:suburb=Länggasse), obwohl das Quartier nicht zur postalischen Adresse gehört. [^1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:suburb Gibt es einen Grund für diese addr:suburb-Tags? Würden die eingezeichneten Quartier-Grenzen nicht ausreichen? Grüsse Markus

11 44

PokemonGO wieder mal
by Simon Poole 23 Jul '18

23 Jul '18

Beim Vandalen nachgehen, hab ich noch https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Obsidian1986 gesehen, vermutlich alles Blödsinn, kann jemand lokales das mal anschauen? Simon

2 1

Vandale im Grossraum TG / SG unterwegs
by Simon Poole 23 Jul '18

23 Jul '18

Wir haben einen Vandalen im Grossraum TG/SG unterwegs der wiederholt Unsinn und leider auch rassistische Edits gemacht hat, bis jetzt haben sie die Usernames Tima000h und Louserhaft schwemer verwendet. Haltet bitte die Augen etwas auf und falls ihr was findet bitte der DWG melden und nicht nur reverten. Danke Simon

2 2

Wochennotiz Nr. 417 10.07.2018–16.07.2018
by Wochennotizteam 23 Jul '18

23 Jul '18

Hallo, die Wochennotiz Nr. 417 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap-Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2018/07/wochennotiz-nr-417/ Viel Spaß beim Lesen!

1 0

Map consistency - private floating islands
by Kai Pankrath 22 Jul '18

22 Jul '18

Hi all, I am working on the map quality using https://www.keepright.at (as well as http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/) and encountered the "floating island" problem (ways not connected to the rest of the map). I came across one specific situation and can think of another: 1. The way is in a private garden and the only access would be "through" the house (physical entering through the main entrance and potentially entering a garden through a terrace door) like here: https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=19 <https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=19&lat=47.55724&lon=7.6253&lay ers=B0T&ch=0%2C130&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0> &lat=47.55724&lon=7.6253&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C130&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0 2. I have not found a good example, but you can think of a park with limited access and entrance as well as exit are only possible through the building (e.g. a castle or museum where you pay a fee to access other areas). Basic question: How to map that? I see one option for private ways: I would simply add "access=private" and any consistency checker could pick that up in the future ignoring "private" islands. For more public-like situations I am not so sure. Adding a highway=footway/tunnel=yes (+layer?) through the building? Adding properties at the end points of the way networks similar to amenity=parking_entrance (+creating a relation between these points)? Any suggestions? Regards, Kai

3 2

Sind Höhenlinien eine exakte Referenz?
by Sentalize 20 Jul '18

20 Jul '18

Hallo Leuts Eine Noobfrage: Wenn man Höehenlinien wie zB diese von VF.Alps nutzt, sind diese "koordiantenkorrekt"... soll heissen: Darf man deren "Gipfel" als Referenzepunkte fuer das Orientieren/Verschieben von Satellitenbildern nutzen, indem man erkennbare Bergspitzen etc auf dem Satbild ueber die Hoehenlinienemaxima der Hoehenlinienkarte legt? Ich hoffe das war jetzt irgendwie klar genug formuliert. Cheers, Philippe

3 4

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

talk-ch