Salut!
Der erste OSM-Stammtisch im 2019 findet in Ende Woche zur
üblichen Zeit am üblichen Ort statt:
Datum: Freitag, 11. Januar 2019
Zeit: ab 18:30 Uhr
Ort: ETH-Hauptgebäude, drinnen zwischen bQm und ETH-Mensa
Karte, weitere Infos und (unverbindliche) Anmeldung:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Switzerland:Z%C3%BCrich/OSM-Treffen#…
Gruss
Packi
Hallo zäme.
Letzthin habe ich gelesen, dass alle Agip-Tankstellen zu Eni-Tankstellen
werden: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=aus+agip+wird+eni
Mit einer kleinen Overpass-Turbo-Suche habe ich 29
Agip-Tankstellen-Nodes gefunden [1] und bei diesen in JOSM "brand" und
"operator" von Agip auf Eni geändert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66014075 (falls Operator nicht
etwas anderes war...)
Bei all diesen Nodes war "name=Agip" eingetragen.
Wenn ich https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel#Names
richtig interpretiere, brauchen Tankstellen nur einen Namen, wenn dieser
speziell ist, oder?
Findet ihr's richtig, dass ich den Namen entfernt habe, weil das für
mich unter 'Tagging für den Renderer' geht, oder soll der Name 'Eni'
bleiben, bzw. wieder rein?
Gruss,
Habi
[1]: Es hat noch einige mehr: https://osm.li/4x
While working on some of the more rural municipalities in the canton
Berne for the address import
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canton_of_Bern_Address_Import I've
noticed that a couple of them have been heavily googefied, aka place
names have been added to the streets instead of adding a place node/area
and using addr:place instead of addr:street in any addresses associated
with the location. This is simply, wrong, because, well, the streets
have no names :-) (in some cases they do actually have their own
independent names which due to the mis-tagging has been overwritten).
To help with doing this correctly I've added per municipalities "all"
links on http://qa.poole.ch/ch-roads/ that will display the full list of
entities from the GWR street list for the resp. municipality. As always
with "official" data it needs to be taken with a couple of grains of
salt and with brains turned on, but in general entities that are
declared as "road", "area" and "points" will actually be that, with
"none" very often used when the people entering the data being out of
their depth, so most of the times this indicates that the entity is not
a road.
I'm not proposing an organised clean up effort, but if you are working
on such an area please fix the issues en passant.
Simon
Yes, a new year is approaching with alarming speed, as every year since
we imported the municipal administrative boundaries we will update them
on the 1.1. or soon after. I've prepared (again as always) a list to
facilitate splitting the work up:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/2019_Municipality_Mergers
Notes:
* the list was based on information from the BfS from September 20th,
it has been known (in 2017 for example) for a last minute update to
turn up
* what exactly is happening in Kallnach seems to be unclear, does
anybody local know? Otherwise I suspect that there will be a last
minute update, see above :-)
* the number of changes is very low this year, please do not commit
any changes before the 1st of January, the work can easily be done
in an hour.
Simon
Bonjour à toutes et à tous,
Autour de Châtel-saint-Denis se trouvent de nombreux "lieux dits" comme
par exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2255312155
Comme par hasard ceux-ci sont parfaitement identiques à ceux imprimés
sur les cartes au 1:25000 de SwissTopo.... Alors que je croyais que
c'était interdit de faire cela.
Salutations.
--
Jonathan Masur
Rue du Bourg 18
1071 Chexbres
Tel. 021 946 18 87
Salut
Kann wer das flicken? Ich getrau' mich da nicht so recht mit
importierten Grenzen :-(
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64418212
cheeers, h.
--
Andreas Bürki
abuerki(a)anidor.com
S/MIME certificate - SHA-256 fingerprint:
8A:1A:C2:93:10:4B:CE:91:2C:80:79:44:24:1D:38:CA:EE:0E:89:C9:A5:A4:A0:03:FF:5A:FB:D1:15:18:B5:45
GnuPG - GPG fingerprint:
5DA7 5F48 25BD D2D7 E488 05DF 5A99 A321 7E42 0227