Some of you may have noticed that I added a "missing" column to
http://qa.poole.ch/ch-roads/ end of last year, this is the difference
between the total number of objects in the GWR list (with a house
number) and the matches found in OSM for the municipality (1).
As an anniversary project and proof of concept, over the last couple of
weeks I've systematically gone through the list and have added missing
streets and street names, and other place objects (mainly farms) for the
Canton Aargau by using the localisation provided by the addresses from
the GWR http://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/ to as far as possible determine
the correct names and add anything that is missing.
Back in 2014 I had already lifted the street names up to nearly complete
by cycling to these places and checking in person, so I was already
starting at a fairly high level, and actually most of the missing roads
were new developments. On the area like objects one of the main issues I
noticed was that, while lots of these had been mapped as
landuse=farmyard and in many cases already had the correct names, but
were missing a place=farm, further when addresses were present they
often were using addr:street instead of addr:place to reference the
place (2).
In any case the net result is that of a total of 20'030 entries we now
only have 41 missing, that is a 99.8% match ratio, this is better than
say for Solothurn where the street data was originally imported and any
other canton (the absolute difference in Basel-Stadt is smaller, but
they have a factor 10 less roads). The 41 missing are typically either
streets where the geometry is unclear, objects missing from the address
data, or other issues with the address data, in some cases it just needs
another check. For example there is a road missing in Mumpf which likely
does really exist, but will need an on the ground survey to determine
where it actually is as it might be partially covered.
Simon
(1) One of the noticeable issues with the current GWR data, particularly
since the update last fall is that we have a lot more systematic
spelling differences, in particular Genève seems to have changed their
capitalisation policy which creates a lot of "false positives" in an
area in which we previously had very good matches. I'm not proposing
that anything should be done in these cases for now, at least not before
we get to the bottom of it (if they've flipped one way, they might flip
back next time, just as the weird issue in FR where roads are currently
being declared as area objects). The matching criteria are deliberately
strict to highlight such differences, but in practical terms they
shouldn't have an impact in day to day use.
(2) Even in the same canton there are large differences how
municipalities treat farms and similar settlements, some will assign
proper house numbers, some don't, some do actually name the roads others
don't googlefy things.
Salut!
Der erste OSM-Stammtisch in Zürich in diesem Jahr findet in einer Woche,
zur üblichen Zeit am üblichen Ort statt:
Datum: Dienstag, 14. Januar 2020
Zeit: ab 18:30 Uhr
Ort: ETH-Hauptgebäude, drinnen zwischen bQm und ETH-Mensa
Karte, weitere Infos und (unverbindliche) Anmeldung:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Switzerland:Z%C3%BCrich/OSM-Treffen#…
Gruss
Packi
(Siehe unten fuer eine deutsche Version.)
Hi everyone,
the State of the Map 2020 conference will have a scholarship program again, and
the organizing team is currently looking for people to join the scholarships
review and selection team [1]. They would like to set up a diverse team with a
wide geographic scope, ethnic and gender diversity, and different kinds of
experiences in the OpenStreetMap community. Please see the blog post [1] for
more details.
If you are interested in becoming a member of the selection team, please fill
in the application form [2] by January 7, 2020.
Submissions for scholarship applications will open on January 15, 2020 and
close on February 15, 2020. There will be a separate announcement with more
details about these.
If you have any questions or feedback, please send an email to
scholar-sotm(a)openstreetmap.org.
(Deutsche Version)
Hallo zusammen,
die "State of the Map 2020"-Konferenz wird wieder ein Stipendienprogramm haben,
und das Organisationsteam sucht derzeit nach Mitgliedern fuer das Review- und
Auswahlteam der Stipendiaten [1]. Sie moechten ein vielfaeltiges Team mit einer
breiten geografische Reichweite, ethnischer und geschlechtlicher Vielfalt sowie
unterschiedlichen Arten von Erfahrungen in der OpenStreetMap-Gemeinschaft. Bitte
beachtet den Blog-Post [1] fuer mehr Details.
Wer daran interessiert ist, Mitglied des Auswahlkomitees zu werden, fuellt
bitte das Antragsformular [2] bis zum 7. Januar 2020 aus.
Die Einreichung von Stipendienantraegen oeffnet am 15. Januar 2020 und dauert
bis zum 15. Februar 2020. Es wird noch eine separate Ankuendigung mit mehr
Details dazu geben.
Wenn es Fragen oder Rueckmeldungen gibt, sendet diese bitte per E-Mail an
scholar-sotm(a)openstreetmap.org.
Manfred
[1] https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2020/01/03/call-for-help-reviewing-sotm-2020…
[2] https://framaforms.org/join-the-state-of-the-map-2020-scholarships-review-t…
Salut Marc
Ja, es hat nur ein Mofa Verbotsschild, kein blaues Fuss/-Fahrradweg.
Darum de-facto.
Danke für den Hinweiss mit highway=path, ich denke, es passt am besten.
Gruss
David
Am Fr, 27. Dez, 2019 um 11:43 VORMITTAGS schrieb marc marc
<marc_marc_irc(a)hotmail.com>:
> Bonjour,
>
> par de-facto, veux-tu dire qu'il n'y a aucun panneau ?
> dans ce cas, j'utilise highway=path (pour les sentier étrtoits)
> et highway=track (pour les chemins + large)
>
> Salutations,
> Marc
>
> Le 27.12.19 à 11:34, David Däster a écrit :
>> Hallo zusammen
>>
>> Wie tage ich einen Weg richtig, auf dem keine motorisierten
>> Fahrzuege
>> (Mofa verboten) sind, nicht aber explizit als Rad-Fussweg
>> deklariert ist.
>>
>> Defacto wäre
>> ja
>> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:segregated?uselang=de>
>> dies
>> der richtige Ansatz. Bin mir aber nicht sicher, da dieses Schild
>> vor Ort
>> nicht vorhanden ist.
>>
>> Gruss
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk-ch mailing list
>> talk-ch(a)openstreetmap.ch <mailto:talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch>
>> <http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk-ch mailing list
> talk-ch(a)openstreetmap.ch <mailto:talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch>
> <http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch>
Hello,
We have recently created a small Geneva based NGO called European Water
Project. Our project is 100% collaborative and 100% open data with the goal
of helping empower individuals to reduce single use waste in their lives.
We have written a set of instructions for adding new water fountains to OSM
and adding photos to existing water fountains in OSM :
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_CH/Project/European_Water_Project
I would greatly appreciate constructive comments from this group on how to
improve these instructions which have been written for a diverse audience -
especially before we start translating them in to other languages. You can
either respond to this chain or email me directly at
stuart(a)europeanwaterproject.org
Our NGO is developing a Progressive Web Application to allow individuals to
find nearby locations where they can refill their sustainable water bottle
for free anywhere in Europe.
The first phase is focused on water fountains but we hope to help
collaboratively create a network of cafes and restaurants which are willing
to allow individuals to fill up their water bottle for free and avoid
single use waste.
The beta version of our PWA application 100% powered by OSM and wikidata is
available at https://europeanwaterproject.org
Best regards,
Stuart Rapoport
Hallo zusammen
Wie tage ich einen Weg richtig, auf dem keine motorisierten Fahrzuege
(Mofa verboten) sind, nicht aber explizit als Rad-Fussweg deklariert
ist.
Defacto wäre ja
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:segregated?uselang=de> dies
der richtige Ansatz. Bin mir aber nicht sicher, da dieses Schild vor
Ort nicht vorhanden ist.
Gruss
Dave
Bonjour à tous,
Je trouve extrêmement dommage que des lignes FlixBus soient entrée dans
la base de données OSM et affichées sur le rendu de transports public
comme n'importe quelle ligne de bus urbain. De fait, toute l'autoroute
est marquée en rouge ( ici à Lausanne
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/46.5254/6.6189&layers=T ) et la
desserte en bus urbain (ici les TL) devient illisible à cause de cela.
Pire, des tronçons en ville sont en rouge à cause de FlixBus, ce qui
crée une confusion entre les deux réseaux.
Je n'ai jamais voyagé avec un autocar FlixBus, donc je ne sais pas
exactement si ça compte comme transport public ou non. Il n'y a par
exemple probablement pas possibilité d'acheter des billets au arrêts, ce
qui en fait pour moi presque un transport privé qui ne devrait pas
figurer sur le rendu transport public. Si les lignes FlixBus sont
affichées sur le rendu, alors elles devraient l'être d'une manière
clairement distincte de celle des lignes urbaines, vu que les deux
services sont totalement différents.
Que peut-on faire ?
Avec mes salutations les meilleures,
--
Jonathan Masur
Rue du Bourg 18
1071 Chexbres
Tel. 021 946 18 87