Hi,
at the last OSM meeting in Zurich, the question was raised where we are in Switzerland with respect to the proposed licence change[3], that is, how many of Swiss mappers have already agreed to the new licence.
So I have run the list of users, who have agreed[1], over the Switzerland excerpt from Geofabrik of last night and made a statistic similar to the one published on talk-de for Germany, simply counting the last editor of all objects. This should give us a rough idea. It does, however, not take into account the history of previous edits and gives equal weight to changes on nodes, ways and relations. Those assumptions will certainly not hold when the final decisions have to made about the license change.
Below find a list of the 100 most active mappers, percentage of contribution and if they have agreed to the new contributor terms[2].
Altogether, 3267 users have contributed to the Swiss excerpt but 95% of the data was contributed by only 500 mappers. At the moment 708 of the users active in Switzerland have agreed, making up a total of 40% of the data.
Sarah
[1] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-October/004914.html [2] http://openstreetmap.org/user/terms [3] http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/We_Are_Changing_The_License
user name cumulative contrib % of contrib agreed to CT ======================================================================= FischersFritz 11.67 11.67 yes hdus 8.91 20.59 ? kuede 6.28 26.86 yes samot 3.07 29.93 ? kds_ch 2.75 32.68 yes Stéphane Brunner 2.47 35.15 yes Marc Mongenet 1.96 37.11 ? Balgofil 1.54 38.65 yes mdk 1.50 40.15 yes guggis 1.37 41.52 ? tmeller 1.12 42.64 ? mcdmx 1.04 43.68 ? teich 0.94 44.62 yes Simonexxx83 0.91 45.53 ? Romain Aviolat [Xens] 0.89 46.42 ? bass 0.89 47.31 ? rüdi 0.84 48.16 ? feuerstein 0.84 49.00 ? t-i 0.79 49.79 yes efred 0.72 50.51 yes Schäuble Michele 0.70 51.21 ? Martouf 0.63 51.83 ? lonvia 0.62 52.45 yes studerap 0.61 53.06 ? gigu 0.60 53.66 ? interspring 0.59 54.24 ? gregus_ 0.54 54.78 ? HB9DTX 0.53 55.32 ? TeeSeR 0.53 55.84 ? mocoohay 0.52 56.37 ? qpeso 0.51 56.88 ? Adrian Vogt 0.50 57.38 yes rockcreek 0.49 57.87 yes aMuTeX 0.49 58.36 yes bobo11 0.45 58.81 ? x-pab 0.45 59.26 yes Andy Stricker 0.44 59.70 yes joshx 0.40 60.10 yes LeoZ 0.39 60.49 yes gd-wg 0.37 60.86 ? Enif 0.37 61.23 ? hromain 0.36 61.60 ? zwis 0.36 61.96 ? ervano 0.36 62.31 ? RalpH_himself 0.36 62.67 ? kowoma 0.36 63.03 ? wisieb 0.35 63.38 ? Schlossberg 0.35 63.73 ? kuede2 0.33 64.06 yes mgeiser 0.32 64.38 ? Johnny Graber 0.32 64.70 ? NDB 0.31 65.01 yes Chico 0.31 65.32 ? demi 0.31 65.63 ? pi1 0.30 65.93 ? hanskuster 0.30 66.23 ? WilhelmTux 0.30 66.53 ? dave_zh 0.30 66.83 yes Evan Sebire 0.29 67.12 ? klausis 0.29 67.41 yes SimonPoole 0.29 67.70 yes Freebourg 0.29 67.99 ? rubliexpress 0.28 68.27 yes benni_75 0.28 68.55 ? mariner 0.27 68.82 ? tschoerbi 0.27 69.09 yes PHerison 0.26 69.35 ? marc71ch 0.26 69.61 ? umbi 0.25 69.86 ? longsch 0.25 70.11 ? phono 0.24 70.34 yes Markus B 0.23 70.57 ? Xango 0.23 70.80 ? Teddych 0.22 71.02 ? mastermarkush 0.21 71.23 ? _kendell 0.21 71.44 yes zugersee 0.20 71.64 ? wolfgang-ch 0.20 71.84 ? Roadrunner21 0.20 72.05 yes pimpon 0.20 72.25 ? schmandr 0.20 72.44 ? Andrew Lunn 0.20 72.64 ? twalter 0.20 72.84 ? GPS-Jack 0.19 73.03 ? datendelphin 0.19 73.22 ? gosausee 0.19 73.42 ? lb_daniel 0.19 73.60 ? GP4Flo 0.18 73.79 ? stedewa 0.18 73.97 ? tesche 0.18 74.15 ? b_l 0.18 74.32 yes cate 0.18 74.50 yes boehrli 0.18 74.67 ? roadfox 0.17 74.85 ? Tric 0.17 75.02 yes OSMfan 0.16 75.18 yes Shernott 0.16 75.35 yes Rastatter 0.16 75.51 ? ueliw0 0.16 75.67 yes Daniel Ribagnac 0.16 75.83 ? bergamote 0.16 75.99 yes
Thanks Sarah
Does anybody know hdus? He is a current and active mapper, and would already get us near 50% if he agrees.
Simon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Sarah Hoffmann" lonvia@denofr.de To: talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 12:13 PM Subject: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
Hi,
at the last OSM meeting in Zurich, the question was raised where we are in Switzerland with respect to the proposed licence change[3], that is, how many of Swiss mappers have already agreed to the new licence.
So I have run the list of users, who have agreed[1], over the Switzerland excerpt from Geofabrik of last night and made a statistic similar to the one published on talk-de for Germany, simply counting the last editor of all objects. This should give us a rough idea. It does, however, not take into account the history of previous edits and gives equal weight to changes on nodes, ways and relations. Those assumptions will certainly not hold when the final decisions have to made about the license change.
Below find a list of the 100 most active mappers, percentage of contribution and if they have agreed to the new contributor terms[2].
Altogether, 3267 users have contributed to the Swiss excerpt but 95% of the data was contributed by only 500 mappers. At the moment 708 of the users active in Switzerland have agreed, making up a total of 40% of the data.
Sarah
[1] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-October/004914.html [2] http://openstreetmap.org/user/terms [3] http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/We_Are_Changing_The_License
user name cumulative contrib % of contrib agreed to CT ======================================================================= FischersFritz 11.67 11.67 yes hdus 8.91 20.59 ? kuede 6.28 26.86 yes samot 3.07 29.93 ? kds_ch 2.75 32.68 yes Stéphane Brunner 2.47 35.15 yes Marc Mongenet 1.96 37.11 ? Balgofil 1.54 38.65 yes mdk 1.50 40.15 yes guggis 1.37 41.52 ? tmeller 1.12 42.64 ? mcdmx 1.04 43.68 ? teich 0.94 44.62 yes Simonexxx83 0.91 45.53 ? Romain Aviolat [Xens] 0.89 46.42 ? bass 0.89 47.31 ? rüdi 0.84 48.16 ? feuerstein 0.84 49.00 ? t-i 0.79 49.79 yes efred 0.72 50.51 yes Schäuble Michele 0.70 51.21 ? Martouf 0.63 51.83 ? lonvia 0.62 52.45 yes studerap 0.61 53.06 ? gigu 0.60 53.66 ? interspring 0.59 54.24 ? gregus_ 0.54 54.78 ? HB9DTX 0.53 55.32 ? TeeSeR 0.53 55.84 ? mocoohay 0.52 56.37 ? qpeso 0.51 56.88 ? Adrian Vogt 0.50 57.38 yes rockcreek 0.49 57.87 yes aMuTeX 0.49 58.36 yes bobo11 0.45 58.81 ? x-pab 0.45 59.26 yes Andy Stricker 0.44 59.70 yes joshx 0.40 60.10 yes LeoZ 0.39 60.49 yes gd-wg 0.37 60.86 ? Enif 0.37 61.23 ? hromain 0.36 61.60 ? zwis 0.36 61.96 ? ervano 0.36 62.31 ? RalpH_himself 0.36 62.67 ? kowoma 0.36 63.03 ? wisieb 0.35 63.38 ? Schlossberg 0.35 63.73 ? kuede2 0.33 64.06 yes mgeiser 0.32 64.38 ? Johnny Graber 0.32 64.70 ? NDB 0.31 65.01 yes Chico 0.31 65.32 ? demi 0.31 65.63 ? pi1 0.30 65.93 ? hanskuster 0.30 66.23 ? WilhelmTux 0.30 66.53 ? dave_zh 0.30 66.83 yes Evan Sebire 0.29 67.12 ? klausis 0.29 67.41 yes SimonPoole 0.29 67.70 yes Freebourg 0.29 67.99 ? rubliexpress 0.28 68.27 yes benni_75 0.28 68.55 ? mariner 0.27 68.82 ? tschoerbi 0.27 69.09 yes PHerison 0.26 69.35 ? marc71ch 0.26 69.61 ? umbi 0.25 69.86 ? longsch 0.25 70.11 ? phono 0.24 70.34 yes Markus B 0.23 70.57 ? Xango 0.23 70.80 ? Teddych 0.22 71.02 ? mastermarkush 0.21 71.23 ? _kendell 0.21 71.44 yes zugersee 0.20 71.64 ? wolfgang-ch 0.20 71.84 ? Roadrunner21 0.20 72.05 yes pimpon 0.20 72.25 ? schmandr 0.20 72.44 ? Andrew Lunn 0.20 72.64 ? twalter 0.20 72.84 ? GPS-Jack 0.19 73.03 ? datendelphin 0.19 73.22 ? gosausee 0.19 73.42 ? lb_daniel 0.19 73.60 ? GP4Flo 0.18 73.79 ? stedewa 0.18 73.97 ? tesche 0.18 74.15 ? b_l 0.18 74.32 yes cate 0.18 74.50 yes boehrli 0.18 74.67 ? roadfox 0.17 74.85 ? Tric 0.17 75.02 yes OSMfan 0.16 75.18 yes Shernott 0.16 75.35 yes Rastatter 0.16 75.51 ? ueliw0 0.16 75.67 yes Daniel Ribagnac 0.16 75.83 ? bergamote 0.16 75.99 yes
_______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
Hi Simon,
Does anybody know hdus? He is a current and active mapper, and would already get us near 50% if he agrees.
That's Horst Düster, Head of SO!GIS
http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/pipermail/talk-ch/2010-April/000773.html
Maybe the decree is finished by now..
Regards, Thomas
Hi,
I did not contributed much to Openstreetmap : I just mapped my village, Conthey and added some information in Vevey. But I would like to add my agreement to the licence changes for my contributions, and I consider them as Public Domain.
Best regards, François Bianco
Le samedi 16 octobre 2010 12.13:02 Sarah Hoffmann, vous avez écrit :
Hi,
at the last OSM meeting in Zurich, the question was raised where we are in Switzerland with respect to the proposed licence change[3], that is, how many of Swiss mappers have already agreed to the new licence.
So I have run the list of users, who have agreed[1], over the Switzerland excerpt from Geofabrik of last night and made a statistic similar to the one published on talk-de for Germany, simply counting the last editor of all objects. This should give us a rough idea. It does, however, not take into account the history of previous edits and gives equal weight to changes on nodes, ways and relations. Those assumptions will certainly not hold when the final decisions have to made about the license change.
Below find a list of the 100 most active mappers, percentage of contribution and if they have agreed to the new contributor terms[2].
Altogether, 3267 users have contributed to the Swiss excerpt but 95% of the data was contributed by only 500 mappers. At the moment 708 of the users active in Switzerland have agreed, making up a total of 40% of the data.
Sarah
[1] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-October/004914.ht ml [2] http://openstreetmap.org/user/terms [3] http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/We_Are_Changing_The_License
user name cumulative contrib % of contrib agreed to CT======================================================================= FischersFritz 11.67 11.67 yes hdus 8.91 20.59 ? kuede 6.28 26.86 yes samot 3.07 29.93 ? kds_ch 2.75 32.68 yes Stéphane Brunner 2.47 35.15 yes Marc Mongenet 1.96 37.11 ? Balgofil 1.54 38.65 yes mdk 1.50 40.15 yes guggis 1.37 41.52 ? tmeller 1.12 42.64 ? mcdmx 1.04 43.68 ? teich 0.94 44.62 yes Simonexxx83 0.91 45.53 ? Romain Aviolat [Xens] 0.89 46.42 ? bass 0.89 47.31 ? rüdi 0.84 48.16 ? feuerstein 0.84 49.00 ? t-i 0.79 49.79 yes efred 0.72 50.51 yes Schäuble Michele 0.70 51.21 ? Martouf 0.63 51.83 ? lonvia 0.62 52.45 yes studerap 0.61 53.06 ? gigu 0.60 53.66 ? interspring 0.59 54.24 ? gregus_ 0.54 54.78 ? HB9DTX 0.53 55.32 ? TeeSeR 0.53 55.84 ? mocoohay 0.52 56.37 ? qpeso 0.51 56.88 ? Adrian Vogt 0.50 57.38 yes rockcreek 0.49 57.87 yes aMuTeX 0.49 58.36 yes bobo11 0.45 58.81 ? x-pab 0.45 59.26 yes Andy Stricker 0.44 59.70 yes joshx 0.40 60.10 yes LeoZ 0.39 60.49 yes gd-wg 0.37 60.86 ? Enif 0.37 61.23 ? hromain 0.36 61.60 ? zwis 0.36 61.96 ? ervano 0.36 62.31 ? RalpH_himself 0.36 62.67 ? kowoma 0.36 63.03 ? wisieb 0.35 63.38 ? Schlossberg 0.35 63.73 ? kuede2 0.33 64.06 yes mgeiser 0.32 64.38 ? Johnny Graber 0.32 64.70 ? NDB 0.31 65.01 yes Chico 0.31 65.32 ? demi 0.31 65.63 ? pi1 0.30 65.93 ? hanskuster 0.30 66.23 ? WilhelmTux 0.30 66.53 ? dave_zh 0.30 66.83 yes Evan Sebire 0.29 67.12 ? klausis 0.29 67.41 yes SimonPoole 0.29 67.70 yes Freebourg 0.29 67.99 ? rubliexpress 0.28 68.27 yes benni_75 0.28 68.55 ? mariner 0.27 68.82 ? tschoerbi 0.27 69.09 yes PHerison 0.26 69.35 ? marc71ch 0.26 69.61 ? umbi 0.25 69.86 ? longsch 0.25 70.11 ? phono 0.24 70.34 yes Markus B 0.23 70.57 ? Xango 0.23 70.80 ? Teddych 0.22 71.02 ? mastermarkush 0.21 71.23 ? _kendell 0.21 71.44 yes zugersee 0.20 71.64 ? wolfgang-ch 0.20 71.84 ? Roadrunner21 0.20 72.05 yes pimpon 0.20 72.25 ? schmandr 0.20 72.44 ? Andrew Lunn 0.20 72.64 ? twalter 0.20 72.84 ? GPS-Jack 0.19 73.03 ? datendelphin 0.19 73.22 ? gosausee 0.19 73.42 ? lb_daniel 0.19 73.60 ? GP4Flo 0.18 73.79 ? stedewa 0.18 73.97 ? tesche 0.18 74.15 ? b_l 0.18 74.32 yes cate 0.18 74.50 yes boehrli 0.18 74.67 ? roadfox 0.17 74.85 ? Tric 0.17 75.02 yes OSMfan 0.16 75.18 yes Shernott 0.16 75.35 yes Rastatter 0.16 75.51 ? ueliw0 0.16 75.67 yes Daniel Ribagnac 0.16 75.83 ? bergamote 0.16 75.99 yes
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
Hi Francis,
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 08:43:59PM +0200, François Bianco wrote:
I did not contributed much to Openstreetmap : I just mapped my village, Conthey and added some information in Vevey. But I would like to add my agreement to the licence changes for my contributions, and I consider them as Public Domain.
To agree to the licence change, you must log into the openstreetmap.org website and go to your user page. There you find a link to the page that allows you to agree to the licence. To also indicate that you consider your data public domain, click the little check box at the bottom of the page.
Sarah
Salut Sarah,
To agree to the licence change, you must log into the openstreetmap.org website and go to your user page. There you find a link to the page that allows you to agree to the licence. To also indicate that you consider your data public domain, click the little check box at the bottom of the page.
Done ! Merci pour l'information.
François
Done.
And hello to François Bianco , I didn't know other mappers in the riviera..
Sean Boran, Blonay
2010/10/16 François Bianco fbianco@swisslinux.org
...
François
Hi ,
I agree with the new licence. i think i have lost information , or don't read ... Could you explain where and how i can vote ?
Best regards. Pierre
Pierre Boizot CH-1009 PULLY
2010/10/16 Sarah Hoffmann lonvia@denofr.de
Hi,
at the last OSM meeting in Zurich, the question was raised where we are in Switzerland with respect to the proposed licence change[3], that is, how many of Swiss mappers have already agreed to the new licence.
So I have run the list of users, who have agreed[1], over the Switzerland excerpt from Geofabrik of last night and made a statistic similar to the one published on talk-de for Germany, simply counting the last editor of all objects. This should give us a rough idea. It does, however, not take into account the history of previous edits and gives equal weight to changes on nodes, ways and relations. Those assumptions will certainly not hold when the final decisions have to made about the license change.
Below find a list of the 100 most active mappers, percentage of contribution and if they have agreed to the new contributor terms[2].
Altogether, 3267 users have contributed to the Swiss excerpt but 95% of the data was contributed by only 500 mappers. At the moment 708 of the users active in Switzerland have agreed, making up a total of 40% of the data.
Sarah
[1] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-October/004914.html [2] http://openstreetmap.org/user/terms [3] http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/We_Are_Changing_The_License
user name cumulative contrib % of contrib agreed to CT======================================================================= FischersFritz 11.67 11.67 yes hdus 8.91 20.59 ? kuede 6.28 26.86 yes samot 3.07 29.93 ? kds_ch 2.75 32.68 yes Stéphane Brunner 2.47 35.15 yes Marc Mongenet 1.96 37.11 ? Balgofil 1.54 38.65 yes mdk 1.50 40.15 yes guggis 1.37 41.52 ? tmeller 1.12 42.64 ? mcdmx 1.04 43.68 ? teich 0.94 44.62 yes Simonexxx83 0.91 45.53 ? Romain Aviolat [Xens] 0.89 46.42 ? bass 0.89 47.31 ? rüdi 0.84 48.16 ? feuerstein 0.84 49.00 ? t-i 0.79 49.79 yes efred 0.72 50.51 yes Schäuble Michele 0.70 51.21 ? Martouf 0.63 51.83 ? lonvia 0.62 52.45 yes studerap 0.61 53.06 ? gigu 0.60 53.66 ? interspring 0.59 54.24 ? gregus_ 0.54 54.78 ? HB9DTX 0.53 55.32 ? TeeSeR 0.53 55.84 ? mocoohay 0.52 56.37 ? qpeso 0.51 56.88 ? Adrian Vogt 0.50 57.38 yes rockcreek 0.49 57.87 yes aMuTeX 0.49 58.36 yes bobo11 0.45 58.81 ? x-pab 0.45 59.26 yes Andy Stricker 0.44 59.70 yes joshx 0.40 60.10 yes LeoZ 0.39 60.49 yes gd-wg 0.37 60.86 ? Enif 0.37 61.23 ? hromain 0.36 61.60 ? zwis 0.36 61.96 ? ervano 0.36 62.31 ? RalpH_himself 0.36 62.67 ? kowoma 0.36 63.03 ? wisieb 0.35 63.38 ? Schlossberg 0.35 63.73 ? kuede2 0.33 64.06 yes mgeiser 0.32 64.38 ? Johnny Graber 0.32 64.70 ? NDB 0.31 65.01 yes Chico 0.31 65.32 ? demi 0.31 65.63 ? pi1 0.30 65.93 ? hanskuster 0.30 66.23 ? WilhelmTux 0.30 66.53 ? dave_zh 0.30 66.83 yes Evan Sebire 0.29 67.12 ? klausis 0.29 67.41 yes SimonPoole 0.29 67.70 yes Freebourg 0.29 67.99 ? rubliexpress 0.28 68.27 yes benni_75 0.28 68.55 ? mariner 0.27 68.82 ? tschoerbi 0.27 69.09 yes PHerison 0.26 69.35 ? marc71ch 0.26 69.61 ? umbi 0.25 69.86 ? longsch 0.25 70.11 ? phono 0.24 70.34 yes Markus B 0.23 70.57 ? Xango 0.23 70.80 ? Teddych 0.22 71.02 ? mastermarkush 0.21 71.23 ? _kendell 0.21 71.44 yes zugersee 0.20 71.64 ? wolfgang-ch 0.20 71.84 ? Roadrunner21 0.20 72.05 yes pimpon 0.20 72.25 ? schmandr 0.20 72.44 ? Andrew Lunn 0.20 72.64 ? twalter 0.20 72.84 ? GPS-Jack 0.19 73.03 ? datendelphin 0.19 73.22 ? gosausee 0.19 73.42 ? lb_daniel 0.19 73.60 ? GP4Flo 0.18 73.79 ? stedewa 0.18 73.97 ? tesche 0.18 74.15 ? b_l 0.18 74.32 yes cate 0.18 74.50 yes boehrli 0.18 74.67 ? roadfox 0.17 74.85 ? Tric 0.17 75.02 yes OSMfan 0.16 75.18 yes Shernott 0.16 75.35 yes Rastatter 0.16 75.51 ? ueliw0 0.16 75.67 yes Daniel Ribagnac 0.16 75.83 ? bergamote 0.16 75.99 yes
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
Hi Pierre,
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 09:44:53AM +0200, Pierre BOIZOT wrote:
Hi ,
I agree with the new licence. i think i have lost information , or don't read ... Could you explain where and how i can vote ?
Log into www.openstreetmap.org, then go to your user page and there to the page with account settings. There you will find a link to the page where you can agree to the new Contributor Terms.
Sarah
Thank , :-) Pierre CH-1009 PULLY
2010/10/17 Sarah Hoffmann lonvia@denofr.de
Hi Pierre,
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 09:44:53AM +0200, Pierre BOIZOT wrote:
Hi ,
I agree with the new licence. i think i have lost information , or don't read ... Could you explain where and how i can vote ?
Log into www.openstreetmap.org, then go to your user page and there to the page with account settings. There you will find a link to the page where you can agree to the new Contributor Terms.
Sarah _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
If you haven't seen it yet on talk-de, there's now a map with the ODBL status of the ways color-coded (visible from zoom level 9 on).
http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/?zoom=9&lat=46.85693&lon=7....
Switzerland looks quite good, at least the places I've checked.
Sarah would it be possible to regenerate your list for Thursday?
Simon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Sarah Hoffmann" lonvia@denofr.de To: talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 11:13 AM Subject: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
Hi,
at the last OSM meeting in Zurich, the question was raised where we are in Switzerland with respect to the proposed licence change[3], that is, how many of Swiss mappers have already agreed to the new licence.
So I have run the list of users, who have agreed[1], over the Switzerland excerpt from Geofabrik of last night and made a statistic similar to the one published on talk-de for Germany, simply counting the last editor of all objects. This should give us a rough idea. It does, however, not take into account the history of previous edits and gives equal weight to changes on nodes, ways and relations. Those assumptions will certainly not hold when the final decisions have to made about the license change.
Below find a list of the 100 most active mappers, percentage of contribution and if they have agreed to the new contributor terms[2].
Altogether, 3267 users have contributed to the Swiss excerpt but 95% of the data was contributed by only 500 mappers. At the moment 708 of the users active in Switzerland have agreed, making up a total of 40% of the data.
Sarah
[1] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-October/004914.html [2] http://openstreetmap.org/user/terms [3] http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/We_Are_Changing_The_License
user name cumulative contrib % of contrib agreed to CT ======================================================================= FischersFritz 11.67 11.67 yes hdus 8.91 20.59 ? kuede 6.28 26.86 yes samot 3.07 29.93 ? kds_ch 2.75 32.68 yes Stéphane Brunner 2.47 35.15 yes Marc Mongenet 1.96 37.11 ? Balgofil 1.54 38.65 yes mdk 1.50 40.15 yes guggis 1.37 41.52 ? tmeller 1.12 42.64 ? mcdmx 1.04 43.68 ? teich 0.94 44.62 yes Simonexxx83 0.91 45.53 ? Romain Aviolat [Xens] 0.89 46.42 ? bass 0.89 47.31 ? rüdi 0.84 48.16 ? feuerstein 0.84 49.00 ? t-i 0.79 49.79 yes efred 0.72 50.51 yes Schäuble Michele 0.70 51.21 ? Martouf 0.63 51.83 ? lonvia 0.62 52.45 yes studerap 0.61 53.06 ? gigu 0.60 53.66 ? interspring 0.59 54.24 ? gregus_ 0.54 54.78 ? HB9DTX 0.53 55.32 ? TeeSeR 0.53 55.84 ? mocoohay 0.52 56.37 ? qpeso 0.51 56.88 ? Adrian Vogt 0.50 57.38 yes rockcreek 0.49 57.87 yes aMuTeX 0.49 58.36 yes bobo11 0.45 58.81 ? x-pab 0.45 59.26 yes Andy Stricker 0.44 59.70 yes joshx 0.40 60.10 yes LeoZ 0.39 60.49 yes gd-wg 0.37 60.86 ? Enif 0.37 61.23 ? hromain 0.36 61.60 ? zwis 0.36 61.96 ? ervano 0.36 62.31 ? RalpH_himself 0.36 62.67 ? kowoma 0.36 63.03 ? wisieb 0.35 63.38 ? Schlossberg 0.35 63.73 ? kuede2 0.33 64.06 yes mgeiser 0.32 64.38 ? Johnny Graber 0.32 64.70 ? NDB 0.31 65.01 yes Chico 0.31 65.32 ? demi 0.31 65.63 ? pi1 0.30 65.93 ? hanskuster 0.30 66.23 ? WilhelmTux 0.30 66.53 ? dave_zh 0.30 66.83 yes Evan Sebire 0.29 67.12 ? klausis 0.29 67.41 yes SimonPoole 0.29 67.70 yes Freebourg 0.29 67.99 ? rubliexpress 0.28 68.27 yes benni_75 0.28 68.55 ? mariner 0.27 68.82 ? tschoerbi 0.27 69.09 yes PHerison 0.26 69.35 ? marc71ch 0.26 69.61 ? umbi 0.25 69.86 ? longsch 0.25 70.11 ? phono 0.24 70.34 yes Markus B 0.23 70.57 ? Xango 0.23 70.80 ? Teddych 0.22 71.02 ? mastermarkush 0.21 71.23 ? _kendell 0.21 71.44 yes zugersee 0.20 71.64 ? wolfgang-ch 0.20 71.84 ? Roadrunner21 0.20 72.05 yes pimpon 0.20 72.25 ? schmandr 0.20 72.44 ? Andrew Lunn 0.20 72.64 ? twalter 0.20 72.84 ? GPS-Jack 0.19 73.03 ? datendelphin 0.19 73.22 ? gosausee 0.19 73.42 ? lb_daniel 0.19 73.60 ? GP4Flo 0.18 73.79 ? stedewa 0.18 73.97 ? tesche 0.18 74.15 ? b_l 0.18 74.32 yes cate 0.18 74.50 yes boehrli 0.18 74.67 ? roadfox 0.17 74.85 ? Tric 0.17 75.02 yes OSMfan 0.16 75.18 yes Shernott 0.16 75.35 yes Rastatter 0.16 75.51 ? ueliw0 0.16 75.67 yes Daniel Ribagnac 0.16 75.83 ? bergamote 0.16 75.99 yes
_______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:04:06PM +0100, Simon Poole wrote:
If you haven't seen it yet on talk-de, there's now a map with the ODBL status of the ways color-coded (visible from zoom level 9 on).
http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/?zoom=9&lat=46.85693&lon=7....
Switzerland looks quite good, at least the places I've checked.
Sarah would it be possible to regenerate your list for Thursday?
An updated list is now here
http://osm.lonvia.de/stuff/odbl_agreement_ch.txt
(using yesterday's Switzerland excerpt and the ODbL agreement list of just now)
Out of the 3331 users that edited in Switzerland now 869 have agreed, that makes 57.5% of all data.
Sarah
On 10.11.2010 23:59, Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:04:06PM +0100, Simon Poole wrote:
If you haven't seen it yet on talk-de, there's now a map with the ODBL status of the ways color-coded (visible from zoom level 9 on).
http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/?zoom=9&lat=46.85693&lon=7....
Switzerland looks quite good, at least the places I've checked.
Sarah would it be possible to regenerate your list for Thursday?
An updated list is now here
http://osm.lonvia.de/stuff/odbl_agreement_ch.txt
(using yesterday's Switzerland excerpt and the ODbL agreement list of just now)
Out of the 3331 users that edited in Switzerland now 869 have agreed, that makes 57.5% of all data.
Sarah
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
maybe we should get in touch with those who have not agreed yet but contributed a significant amount of data to ch-osm... ? not to convert them but to ask if they forgot about it... currently some cities and villages would suffer a substantial amount of data loss :(
There's about a further 10% that should be easy (in the sense that it's only a handful of mappers) to get.
I've also approached mappers that I've been in contact with in the past (for other reasons) and have pointed the license change process out to them.
Simon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Schneider" ml@marcschneider.org To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 12:31 AM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
On 10.11.2010 23:59, Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:04:06PM +0100, Simon Poole wrote:
If you haven't seen it yet on talk-de, there's now a map with the ODBL status of the ways color-coded (visible from zoom level 9 on).
http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/?zoom=9&lat=46.85693&lon=7....
Switzerland looks quite good, at least the places I've checked.
Sarah would it be possible to regenerate your list for Thursday?
An updated list is now here
http://osm.lonvia.de/stuff/odbl_agreement_ch.txt
(using yesterday's Switzerland excerpt and the ODbL agreement list of just now)
Out of the 3331 users that edited in Switzerland now 869 have agreed, that makes 57.5% of all data.
Sarah
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
maybe we should get in touch with those who have not agreed yet but contributed a significant amount of data to ch-osm... ? not to convert them but to ask if they forgot about it... currently some cities and villages would suffer a substantial amount of data loss :( _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
A couple of more numbers:
- of the top 100 mappers 55 have already accepted the CTs/ODBL, amounting to 51.1% of the data
- the 45 that haven't agreed yet would give us an additional 25% of the data (bringing the total to 82%)
- of the top 819 mappers amounting to 98% of the data, 600 haven't agreed yet
- the 600 account for 31% of the data
Simon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Poole" simon@poole.ch To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 7:38 AM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
There's about a further 10% that should be easy (in the sense that it's only a handful of mappers) to get. I've also approached mappers that I've been in contact with in the past (for other reasons) and have pointed the license change process out to them.
Simon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Schneider" ml@marcschneider.org To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 12:31 AM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
On 10.11.2010 23:59, Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:04:06PM +0100, Simon Poole wrote:
If you haven't seen it yet on talk-de, there's now a map with the ODBL status of the ways color-coded (visible from zoom level 9 on).
http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/?zoom=9&lat=46.85693&lon=7....
Switzerland looks quite good, at least the places I've checked.
Sarah would it be possible to regenerate your list for Thursday?
An updated list is now here
http://osm.lonvia.de/stuff/odbl_agreement_ch.txt
(using yesterday's Switzerland excerpt and the ODbL agreement list of just now)
Out of the 3331 users that edited in Switzerland now 869 have agreed, that makes 57.5% of all data.
Sarah
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
maybe we should get in touch with those who have not agreed yet but contributed a significant amount of data to ch-osm... ? not to convert them but to ask if they forgot about it... currently some cities and villages would suffer a substantial amount of data loss :( _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
I switched the numbers around by accident, should be:
- of the top 100 mappers 45 have already accepted the CTs/ODBL, amounting to 51.1% of the data
- the 55 that haven't agreed yet would give us an additional 25% of the data (bringing the total to 82%)
getting hold of 55 persons and getting the majority of them to agree is still a trivial exercise.
Simon
- of the top 100 mappers 55 have already accepted the CTs/ODBL, amounting
to 51.1% of the data
- the 45 that haven't agreed yet would give us an additional 25% of the
data (bringing the total to 82%)
Quick update (based on list from Sarah from the 11th, top 100 updated manually by me):
- of the top 10, nine (9) have accepted the CTs, leaving Marc Mongenet as the sole mapper missing (if somebody knows him, it would be a good idea to contact him)
- of the top 100 there are 46 mappers remaining that need to be pointed to the relicensing process, the 54 that have relicensed amount to 56.54% of the data
- in total, adding in a couple of mappers in the top 1000 I know have accepted, we are already over 63%
Simon
PS: Sarah if you regenerate your list, could you put tabs between the fields? :-) Thanks.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Poole" simon@poole.ch To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 9:50 AM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
I switched the numbers around by accident, should be:
- of the top 100 mappers 45 have already accepted the CTs/ODBL, amounting to
51.1% of the data
- the 55 that haven't agreed yet would give us an additional 25% of the data
(bringing the total to 82%)
getting hold of 55 persons and getting the majority of them to agree is still a trivial exercise.
Simon
- of the top 100 mappers 55 have already accepted the CTs/ODBL, amounting
to 51.1% of the data
- the 45 that haven't agreed yet would give us an additional 25% of the
data (bringing the total to 82%)
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
awesome work, thanks a lot Simon!
Who will contact the remaining 46/100 mappers? and should we somehow contact the rest too? In the end every bit of data that does not get lost helps, so in my opinion it's well worth a try!
On 19.11.2010 19:23, Simon Poole wrote:
Quick update (based on list from Sarah from the 11th, top 100 updated manually by me):
- of the top 10, nine (9) have accepted the CTs, leaving Marc Mongenet
as the sole mapper missing (if somebody knows him, it would be a good idea to contact him)
- of the top 100 there are 46 mappers remaining that need to be
pointed to the relicensing process, the 54 that have relicensed amount to 56.54% of the data
- in total, adding in a couple of mappers in the top 1000 I know have
accepted, we are already over 63% Simon
PS: Sarah if you regenerate your list, could you put tabs between the fields? :-) Thanks.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Poole" simon@poole.ch To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 9:50 AM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
I switched the numbers around by accident, should be:
- of the top 100 mappers 45 have already accepted the CTs/ODBL,
amounting to 51.1% of the data
- the 55 that haven't agreed yet would give us an additional 25% of
the data (bringing the total to 82%)
getting hold of 55 persons and getting the majority of them to agree is still a trivial exercise.
Simon
- of the top 100 mappers 55 have already accepted the CTs/ODBL,
amounting to 51.1% of the data
- the 45 that haven't agreed yet would give us an additional 25% of
the data (bringing the total to 82%)
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
Well I didn't really do anything except keep a tally. Anyway, IMHO, anybody in the top 1000 that hasn't signed up makes sense to contact.
Even more so any of the top 100, the 46 mappers amount to 22% or so (a couple of them already have mail from me).
I just woudn't bother with edwin-ldbg :-)
Simon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Schneider" ml@marcschneider.org To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 7:32 PM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
awesome work, thanks a lot Simon!
Who will contact the remaining 46/100 mappers? and should we somehow contact the rest too? In the end every bit of data that does not get lost helps, so in my opinion it's well worth a try!
On 19.11.2010 19:23, Simon Poole wrote:
Quick update (based on list from Sarah from the 11th, top 100 updated manually by me):
- of the top 10, nine (9) have accepted the CTs, leaving Marc Mongenet
as the sole mapper missing (if somebody knows him, it would be a good idea to contact him)
- of the top 100 there are 46 mappers remaining that need to be
pointed to the relicensing process, the 54 that have relicensed amount to 56.54% of the data
- in total, adding in a couple of mappers in the top 1000 I know have
accepted, we are already over 63% Simon
PS: Sarah if you regenerate your list, could you put tabs between the fields? :-) Thanks.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Poole" simon@poole.ch To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 9:50 AM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
I switched the numbers around by accident, should be:
- of the top 100 mappers 45 have already accepted the CTs/ODBL,
amounting to 51.1% of the data
- the 55 that haven't agreed yet would give us an additional 25% of
the data (bringing the total to 82%)
getting hold of 55 persons and getting the majority of them to agree is still a trivial exercise.
Simon
- of the top 100 mappers 55 have already accepted the CTs/ODBL,
amounting to 51.1% of the data
- the 45 that haven't agreed yet would give us an additional 25% of
the data (bringing the total to 82%)
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
shall we make a wiki table based on Sara's list in order to keep track of who contacted whom, together with a "Musterbrief" in 3 german, french and italian everybody can use? Maybe it makes sense that members contact nearby mappers to remind them of the license stuff or discuss open questions with them, so as little data as possible gets lost. I think it's worth a try. If someone does not agree to the new license terms that's okay. as long as they don't forget about the ongoing license stuff...
On 19.11.2010 20:49, Simon Poole wrote:
Well I didn't really do anything except keep a tally. Anyway, IMHO, anybody in the top 1000 that hasn't signed up makes sense to contact.
Even more so any of the top 100, the 46 mappers amount to 22% or so (a couple of them already have mail from me).
I just woudn't bother with edwin-ldbg :-)
Simon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Schneider" ml@marcschneider.org To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 7:32 PM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
awesome work, thanks a lot Simon!
Who will contact the remaining 46/100 mappers? and should we somehow contact the rest too? In the end every bit of data that does not get lost helps, so in my opinion it's well worth a try!
On 19.11.2010 19:23, Simon Poole wrote:
Quick update (based on list from Sarah from the 11th, top 100 updated manually by me):
- of the top 10, nine (9) have accepted the CTs, leaving Marc
Mongenet as the sole mapper missing (if somebody knows him, it would be a good idea to contact him)
- of the top 100 there are 46 mappers remaining that need to be
pointed to the relicensing process, the 54 that have relicensed amount to 56.54% of the data
- in total, adding in a couple of mappers in the top 1000 I know
have accepted, we are already over 63% Simon
PS: Sarah if you regenerate your list, could you put tabs between the fields? :-) Thanks.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Poole" simon@poole.ch To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 9:50 AM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
I switched the numbers around by accident, should be:
- of the top 100 mappers 45 have already accepted the CTs/ODBL,
amounting to 51.1% of the data
- the 55 that haven't agreed yet would give us an additional 25% of
the data (bringing the total to 82%)
getting hold of 55 persons and getting the majority of them to agree is still a trivial exercise.
Simon
- of the top 100 mappers 55 have already accepted the CTs/ODBL,
amounting to 51.1% of the data
- the 45 that haven't agreed yet would give us an additional 25%
of the data (bringing the total to 82%)
_
I believe something along this lines could be done. We would need the numeric id in the table, since it really has to be mandatory to check in the current list (http://planet.openstreetmap.org/users_agreed/) if somebody has agreed or not.
Not that we bombard somebody that has already accepted with mail :-).
I would also recommend having a look at the edit history of the mapper in question (make that a link in the table). That makes it easy to determine if she/he has simple missed the relicensing process by being incative for a while (which is the best intro to a mail).
All that said, I do believe that as a first step, simply getting in contact with mappers that you know personally (not necessarilly in person) that haven't signed up, should be done regardless of any additional technical tools.
Simon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Schneider" ml@marcschneider.org To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 12:42 PM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
shall we make a wiki table based on Sara's list in order to keep track of who contacted whom, together with a "Musterbrief" in 3 german, french and italian everybody can use? Maybe it makes sense that members contact nearby mappers to remind them of the license stuff or discuss open questions with them, so as little data as possible gets lost. I think it's worth a try. If someone does not agree to the new license terms that's okay. as long as they don't forget about the ongoing license stuff...
On 19.11.2010 20:49, Simon Poole wrote:
Well I didn't really do anything except keep a tally. Anyway, IMHO, anybody in the top 1000 that hasn't signed up makes sense to contact.
Even more so any of the top 100, the 46 mappers amount to 22% or so (a couple of them already have mail from me).
I just woudn't bother with edwin-ldbg :-)
Simon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Schneider" ml@marcschneider.org To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 7:32 PM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
awesome work, thanks a lot Simon!
Who will contact the remaining 46/100 mappers? and should we somehow contact the rest too? In the end every bit of data that does not get lost helps, so in my opinion it's well worth a try!
On 19.11.2010 19:23, Simon Poole wrote:
Quick update (based on list from Sarah from the 11th, top 100 updated manually by me):
- of the top 10, nine (9) have accepted the CTs, leaving Marc
Mongenet as the sole mapper missing (if somebody knows him, it would be a good idea to contact him)
- of the top 100 there are 46 mappers remaining that need to be
pointed to the relicensing process, the 54 that have relicensed amount to 56.54% of the data
- in total, adding in a couple of mappers in the top 1000 I know
have accepted, we are already over 63% Simon
PS: Sarah if you regenerate your list, could you put tabs between the fields? :-) Thanks.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Poole" simon@poole.ch To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 9:50 AM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
I switched the numbers around by accident, should be:
- of the top 100 mappers 45 have already accepted the CTs/ODBL,
amounting to 51.1% of the data
- the 55 that haven't agreed yet would give us an additional 25% of
the data (bringing the total to 82%)
getting hold of 55 persons and getting the majority of them to agree is still a trivial exercise.
Simon
- of the top 100 mappers 55 have already accepted the CTs/ODBL,
amounting to 51.1% of the data
- the 45 that haven't agreed yet would give us an additional 25%
of the data (bringing the total to 82%)
_
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
Es geschehen noch Zeichen und Wunder!
Simon schrieb:
I just woudn't bother with edwin-ldbg :-)
http://osm.lonvia.de/stuff/odbl_agreement_ch.txt [...] yes 0.25 70.82 59.95 70 edwin-ldbg [...]
Details und Beweggründe gibt's hier: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=123997
Danke, insbesondere an Fred!
Gruss, Thomas
Ich hät ja auch noch geboten, aber es war vorbei, bevor ich's gelesen habe.
Simon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Ineichen" osm.mailinglist@t-i.ch To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 12:45 AM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
Es geschehen noch Zeichen und Wunder!
Simon schrieb:
I just woudn't bother with edwin-ldbg :-)
http://osm.lonvia.de/stuff/odbl_agreement_ch.txt [...] yes 0.25 70.82 59.95 70 edwin-ldbg [...]
Details und Beweggründe gibt's hier: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=123997
Danke, insbesondere an Fred!
Gruss, Thomas
_______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 07:23:11PM +0100, Simon Poole wrote:
PS: Sarah if you regenerate your list, could you put tabs between the fields? :-) Thanks.
I see that something more automatized is called for. ;) Here we go...
I have created a new list with yesterday's data. From now on the agreement column in this list will be updated once a day with the latest agreement data, so you can easily check, who should still be contacted. Note, however, that I will not update the underlying OSM data because that involves downloading the Swiss excerpt from Geofabrik. Something I don't want to do every day.
Place is still the same: http://osm.lonvia.de/stuff/odbl_agreement_ch.txt
We are at 65% now. (But I see that 0.4% of this are from the recent Didok import. Just as a reminder that everything should be taken with a grain of salt.)
Cheers, Sarah
Thanks Sarah
This helps a lot.
BTW if I didn't think that the relicensing process had so high priority, I would have suggested that the project of the month (or actually rest of the year), should be mapping all missing roads that have stops on them from the Didok import.
Simon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Sarah Hoffmann" lonvia@denofr.de To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 6:03 PM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 07:23:11PM +0100, Simon Poole wrote:
PS: Sarah if you regenerate your list, could you put tabs between the fields? :-) Thanks.
I see that something more automatized is called for. ;) Here we go...
I have created a new list with yesterday's data. From now on the agreement column in this list will be updated once a day with the latest agreement data, so you can easily check, who should still be contacted. Note, however, that I will not update the underlying OSM data because that involves downloading the Swiss excerpt from Geofabrik. Something I don't want to do every day.
Place is still the same: http://osm.lonvia.de/stuff/odbl_agreement_ch.txt
We are at 65% now. (But I see that 0.4% of this are from the recent Didok import. Just as a reminder that everything should be taken with a grain of salt.)
Cheers, Sarah _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
Hi Simon,
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 08:26:27PM +0100, Simon Poole wrote:
This helps a lot.
BTW if I didn't think that the relicensing process had so high priority, I would have suggested that the project of the month (or actually rest of the year), should be mapping all missing roads that have stops on them from the Didok import.
I absolutely agree about the importance of relicensing and I'm glad to see that you have taken such an active interest.
I've changed the format of the list once more moving the names in the last row to make it human-readable with the tabs again. All the other rows remain unchanged.
Sarah
Hi
Sorry i missed what i have todo for the relicensing, just saw my name on sarah's list. Are there somewhere some instructions?
Andreas Fuchs Holzstrasse 85 3504 Niederhünigen
Mail: Fox@TcNet.ch Phone: 078 740 93 80
Am 23.11.2010 um 08:39 schrieb Sarah Hoffmann lonvia@denofr.de:
Hi Simon,
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 08:26:27PM +0100, Simon Poole wrote:
This helps a lot.
BTW if I didn't think that the relicensing process had so high priority, I would have suggested that the project of the month (or actually rest of the year), should be mapping all missing roads that have stops on them from the Didok import.
I absolutely agree about the importance of relicensing and I'm glad to see that you have taken such an active interest.
I've changed the format of the list once more moving the names in the last row to make it human-readable with the tabs again. All the other rows remain unchanged.
Sarah _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
Hi Andreas, On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:41:50AM +0100, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
Hi
Sorry i missed what i have todo for the relicensing, just saw my name on sarah's list. Are there somewhere some instructions?
Go to http://openstreetmap.org/user/terms
You have to be logged in with your OSM credentials. There you can see the new license and accept it. Please note that the Contributor Terms are likely to change some more, mostly to clarify things for imports. You can see a draft of the new CTs here: https://docs.google.com/View?id=dc3bxdhs_0cc77vdd9
More background info about the license is here: http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/We_Are_Changing_The_License
Sarah
Andreas Fuchs Holzstrasse 85 3504 Niederhünigen
Mail: Fox@TcNet.ch Phone: 078 740 93 80
Am 23.11.2010 um 08:39 schrieb Sarah Hoffmann lonvia@denofr.de:
Hi Simon,
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 08:26:27PM +0100, Simon Poole wrote:
This helps a lot.
BTW if I didn't think that the relicensing process had so high priority, I would have suggested that the project of the month (or actually rest of the year), should be mapping all missing roads that have stops on them from the Didok import.
I absolutely agree about the importance of relicensing and I'm glad to see that you have taken such an active interest.
I've changed the format of the list once more moving the names in the last row to make it human-readable with the tabs again. All the other rows remain unchanged.
Sarah _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
I've added a page to the Swiss part of the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/EN:Switzerland/ODBL_Status
Simon
Prompt zum Jahresende haben wir 75% (in der "last edit" Statistik) überschritten. Trotz der verhältnismässig hohen Zustimmung verglichen mit anderen Ländern, fehlen von den Top 100 Mappern gute 25% und ca. 10% der Daten. Mit anderen Worten ziemlich wenig Mapper könnten uns in die Nähe von 90% bringen.
Simon
Top 10 complete (thanks Marc).
This brings us somewhere near or over 70% of the data relicensed in total, and 41 mappers missing from the top 100.
Simon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Poole" simon@poole.ch To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 7:23 PM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
Quick update (based on list from Sarah from the 11th, top 100 updated manually by me):
- of the top 10, nine (9) have accepted the CTs, leaving Marc Mongenet as
the sole mapper missing (if somebody knows him, it would be a good idea to contact him)
- of the top 100 there are 46 mappers remaining that need to be pointed to
the relicensing process, the 54 that have relicensed amount to 56.54% of the data
- in total, adding in a couple of mappers in the top 1000 I know have
accepted, we are already over 63% Simon
PS: Sarah if you regenerate your list, could you put tabs between the fields? :-) Thanks.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Poole" simon@poole.ch To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 9:50 AM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
I switched the numbers around by accident, should be:
- of the top 100 mappers 45 have already accepted the CTs/ODBL, amounting
to 51.1% of the data
- the 55 that haven't agreed yet would give us an additional 25% of the
data (bringing the total to 82%)
getting hold of 55 persons and getting the majority of them to agree is still a trivial exercise.
Simon
- of the top 100 mappers 55 have already accepted the CTs/ODBL,
amounting to 51.1% of the data
- the 45 that haven't agreed yet would give us an additional 25% of the
data (bringing the total to 82%)
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
Hallo Sarah,
Danke für die Liste! (Und danke an Simon, vor dem offenbar kein Nicht-Abstimmer sicher ist.. ;) )
Folgende zwei Wünsche hätte ich noch: a) Eine kumulative %-Spalte der ODbL-Daten ("von den ersten 20 Mappern haben 45.02% der ODbL zugestimmt") b) Die selbe Statistik, allerdings nur für highway-Elemente (der Massenimport von Gebäuden verzerrt die Statistik mMn ein bisschen).
a) sollte einfach sein, b) weiss ich nicht.. :)
Gruss, Thomas
Also sooooo schlimm bin ich jetzt auch nicht :-)
Kurz ernsthaft: die einzige Art aus dem aktuellen Schlamassel halbwegs heraus zu kommen, ist in der freiwilligen Phase des Wechsels schon klare Mehrheiten zu haben (d.h. in der Praxis: ein sehr grosser Anteil der Daten und ein signifikanter Teil der wirklich aktiven Mapper).
Passiert das erst wenn man "muss", so werden die Diskussionen erst recht los gehen.
Simon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Ineichen" osm.mailinglist@t-i.ch To: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 5:43 PM Subject: Re: [talk-ch] licence change - status Switzerland
Hallo Sarah,
Danke für die Liste! (Und danke an Simon, vor dem offenbar kein Nicht-Abstimmer sicher ist.. ;) )
Folgende zwei Wünsche hätte ich noch: a) Eine kumulative %-Spalte der ODbL-Daten ("von den ersten 20 Mappern haben 45.02% der ODbL zugestimmt") b) Die selbe Statistik, allerdings nur für highway-Elemente (der Massenimport von Gebäuden verzerrt die Statistik mMn ein bisschen).
a) sollte einfach sein, b) weiss ich nicht.. :)
Gruss, Thomas
_______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
Hoi,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 05:43:07PM +0100, Thomas Ineichen wrote:
Folgende zwei Wünsche hätte ich noch: a) Eine kumulative %-Spalte der ODbL-Daten ("von den ersten 20 Mappern haben 45.02% der ODbL zugestimmt")
Ich bin gerade nicht sicher, ob du % zustimmender Mapper oder % zugestimmter Daten meinst, also habe ich mal beides eingefuegt: http://osm.lonvia.de/stuff/odbl_agreement_ch.txt
b) Die selbe Statistik, allerdings nur für highway-Elemente (der Massenimport von Gebäuden verzerrt die Statistik mMn ein bisschen).
http://osm.lonvia.de/stuff/odbl_agreement_ch_highway.txt
Wie fuer die andere Auswertung stammen die OSM-Daten vom 20/11 und geht ueber alle Wege mit highway-Tag (keine Knoten oder Relationen). Ich sehe schon, warum dir diese Statistik lieber ist. ;)
Aber ernsthaft: interessanterweise aendert es wenig am Endergebnis, etwa 70% der Daten sind relizensiert. Das heisst dann vermutlich, dass auch die Komplettstatistik aussagekraeftig genug ist.
Gruss
Sarah
-
Andreas Fuchs -
François Bianco -
Marc Schneider -
Pierre BOIZOT -
Sarah Hoffmann -
Sean Boran -
Simon Poole -
Thomas Ineichen