Hello,
dikkeknodel thanks for pointing out somes exemples. I revert myself the import a few weeks ago after talking with the DWG.
So the redact should not have created a new version of the objects and even less modified them, the redact should have been limited to hidding the problematic version of the objects. I'm writing to the DWG to see what happened and let you know. I think it is better to not to modify these objects in the coming hours in order to facilitate the overall fix.
Regards, Marc
Le 25. 07. 18 à 08:29, _ dikkeknodel a écrit :
Hi all,
I had a closer look at the naoliv’s redaction CS61021881 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61021881.
I see, many previously rectangular buildings have now become triangles or just an open L-shape.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317495841
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317495891
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317487442
etc.
More complex shapes have also lost a node and became less complex with some very weird shapes.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317487614
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317336799
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317336826
etc.
It is all over the place basically. If a look to the pre-redaction version of the buildings, they seem to be nicely rectangular.
It also seems that the address data entered with CS60359203 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60359203, CS60359697 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60359697 and CS60359350 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60359350 have been (mistakenly) redacted (the blue ones in achavi, tag change only). These CSs mention local knowledge as source and there is no mention in the changesets discussions of any problem.
Something seems to have gone wrong with the redaction is my conclusion.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
*Van:* talk-ch talk-ch-bounces@openstreetmap.ch namens marc marc marc_marc_irc@hotmail.com *Verzonden:* Wednesday, July 25, 2018 2:13:37 AM *Aan:* talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch *Onderwerp:* Re: [talk-ch] Corrupt buildings witch building in this changeset is corrupt after naoliv change and not before ?
Le 25. 07. 18 à 01:26, Kt47uo5uVzW a écrit :
Check this: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61021881
No I'm not involved in any kind of this import/region.
Regards
marc marc: > Hello, > > Le 25. 07. 18 à 00:25, Kt47uo5uVzW a écrit : >> I think the latest changesets from user 'naoliv' are erroneous. >> Can somewhere check and maybe revert this? Thanks. > > can you give an exemple ? > naoliv redact (hidde) data copied from Fribourg cadastre > (the licence of the canton of Fribourg doesn't allow it). > so a building should not be corrupted by this redact > but it should be already corrupt before. > > are you the guy that did the import ? > > Regards, > Marc