Hi Marc (or anyone else),
As suggested by Michael a while back, I am scanning the globe once a week for water fountains (modern and historic) in a nested loop of bboxes. After getting all the individual scans, I append them into one large geojson file .. I scan for fountains with a bbox size of 10x10.
I seem to get a faster response using overpass turbo at overpass-turbo.eu using the web interface than with the API. Is this normal ? The total size of the all the responses combined in one file is relatively small : about 50MB (after appending them all in one json file).
It takes me on average about 3 hours to get all the data I need for my database. Do you have any suggestions for how I might improve the process? Or maybe, what I am doing seems ok ?
Thank you for your advice,
Stuart
[out:json][timeout:150];
( node["amenity"="drinking_water"]({{bbox}}); node["drinking_water"="yes"]({{bbox}}); ); // print results out body;
;
out skel qt;
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 14:47, marc marc marc_marc_irc@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello Stuart,
Le 10.02.20 à 14:40, European Water Project a écrit :
Do both server clusters serve the same data via the API and are they updated simultaneously?
all overpass-api servers try to keep in sync from osm.org data via minute "diff" update. but from time to time, that fail or take a little more time. every group of server have often their own sysadmin, it's not a group that takes care of all the overpass-api servers. modern overpass api version return the info with a line like this :
<meta osm_base="2020-02-10T13:42:02Z"/>
Regards, Marc _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch