Hi Marc (or anyone else),

As suggested by Michael a while back, I am scanning the globe once a week for water fountains (modern and historic) in a nested loop of bboxes. After getting all the individual scans, I append them into one large geojson file ..  I scan for fountains with a bbox size of 10x10.

I seem to get a faster response using overpass turbo at overpass-turbo.eu using the web interface than with the API. Is this normal ?  The total size of the all the responses combined in one file is relatively small : about 50MB (after appending them all in one json file). 

It takes me on average about 3 hours to get all the data I need for my database.  Do you have any suggestions for how I might improve the process?  Or maybe, what I am doing seems ok ?

Thank you for your advice,

Stuart 



[out:json][timeout:150];
(
  node["amenity"="drinking_water"]({{bbox}});
  node["drinking_water"="yes"]({{bbox}});
);
// print results
out body;
>;
out skel qt;

On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 14:47, marc marc <marc_marc_irc@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hello Stuart,

Le 10.02.20 à 14:40, European Water Project a écrit :
> Do both server clusters serve the same data via the API and are they
> updated simultaneously?

all overpass-api servers try to keep in sync from osm.org data via
minute "diff" update. but from time to time, that fail or take a little
more time.
every group of server have often their own sysadmin, it's not a group
that takes care of all the overpass-api  servers.
modern overpass api version return the info with a line like this :
<meta osm_base="2020-02-10T13:42:02Z"/>

Regards,
Marc
_______________________________________________
talk-ch mailing list
talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch
http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch