It is clearly not pest practice.
And if anybody doesn't believe, just point then to the 100'000s of objects that have source=bing or similar tagged on them which have been changed multiple times based on other sources and still maintain the, now, bogus tag.
Simon
PS: any yes I originally did that too, but it's a long time ago.
Am 17.11.2021 um 14:29 schrieb jwitp@tutanota.com:
Hi everyone
Recently I realized that the chronology https://taginfo.osm.ch/keys/source#chronology tab for `source` showed a stark incline. Upon further inspection I figured this is mostly due to source=maxar https://taginfo.osm.ch/tags/source=maxar#chronology and source=swisstopo SWISSIMAGE https://taginfo.osm.ch/tags/source=swisstopo%20SWISSIMAGE#chronology.
I thought that tagging like that is discouraged. Is it not? What do you think: should users be asked to stop doing this and if so, how? I don't want to offend anyone.
Greetings j.
P.S. I realize that this is a bit nitpicky. It is, however, a pet peeve of mine.
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch