It is clearly not pest practice.

And if anybody doesn't believe, just point then to the 100'000s of objects that have source=bing or similar tagged on them which have been changed multiple times based on other sources and still maintain the, now, bogus tag.

Simon

PS: any yes I originally did that too, but it's a long time ago.

Hi everyone

Recently I realized that the chronology tab for `source` showed a stark incline.

Upon further inspection I figured this is mostly due to source=maxar and source=swisstopo SWISSIMAGE.

I thought that tagging like that is discouraged. Is it not?

What do you think: should users be asked to stop doing this and if so, how? I don't want to offend anyone.

Greetings j.

P.S. I realize that this is a bit nitpicky. It is, however, a pet peeve of mine.

_______________________________________________
talk-ch mailing list
talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch
http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch