talk-ch July 2017

talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch

9 participants
15 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Adressverzeichnis GEBADR des Kantons Bern
by Stefan Berger 26 Feb '18

26 Feb '18

9 30

Same procedure are last year ...
by Simon Poole 18 Dec '17

18 Dec '17

Yes, a new year is approaching with alarming speed, as every year since we imported the municipal administrative boundaries we will update them on the 1.1. or soon after. I've prepared (again as always) a list to facilitate splitting the work up: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/2017_Municipality_Mergers Note: the Canton Graubünden is replacing its 11 "Bezirke" with 11 "Regions", not quite sure how much work that will be, but it is not really high priority. Simon

4 6

Retina / High DPI
by Johannes Singler 18 Oct '17

18 Oct '17

Hallo zusammen! Mein Notebook hat ein High DPI Display (276 dpi), ungefähr entsprechend "Retina" auf Apple-Maschinen. Nur leider wird die hohe Auflösung von openstreetmap.org nicht unterstützt. Dabei ist sie IMHO gerade für Landkarten eine Offenbarung, wie ich finde: https://osm.rrze.fau.de/testhd.html (falls kein Retina, vergleich es bei Browser-Zoom 200%) Im Prinzip wird sie von Leaflet ja auch untersützt: http://leafletjs.com/reference.html (Flag detectRetina) Weiß jemand, ob Retina-Unterstützung auf der .org-Seite bald geplant ist? Oder könnten wir es einfach für http://routing.osm.ch/ mal aktivieren? Klar, es kostet Speicherplatz und Rechenzeit, aber es macht wirklich einen Unterschied, und es würde einen Vorsprung von Google Maps ausgleichen. Grüsse, Johannes

6 9

Wochennotiz Nr. 366 18.07.2017–24.07.2017
by Wochennotizteam 27 Jul '17

27 Jul '17

Hallo, die Wochennotiz Nr. 366 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap-Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/07/wochennotiz-nr-366/ Viel Spaß beim Lesen!

1 0

missing ref for highway=tertiary
by marc marc 26 Jul '17

26 Jul '17

Hello, Josm signale qu'il manque une ref sur un highway=tertiary. J'ai vérifié chaque morceau de cette route, aucune ref. Où puis-je le trouver ? Josm complaint that there is no ref for a highway=tertiary. I check all part of it, no ref at all. Where can i find it ? Regards, Marc

2 2

Re: [talk-ch] missing ref for highway=tertiary
by Rémi Bovard 25 Jul '17

25 Jul '17

Salut Marc, Tell me if it helps you: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qAT Best regards, Rémi

2 2

Re: [talk-ch] Address on POI inside a building with address
by Rémi Bovard 25 Jul '17

25 Jul '17

Salut Marc, Hallo Stefan, Thank you both of you for your answers, it conforts me in my idea to avoid duplicate informations. I'll continue to map this way, but not neceesary undo some other people edits. For the rendering, it was just a remark about this case. But I think this issue is more global and outside my competences. Best regards, Rémi

1 0

problème changeset 50360860
by marc marc 23 Jul '17

23 Jul '17

Pour info, il y a un problème important avec ce changeset Il a touché 2667 nodes dont certains sont déplacés sans raison. J'ai aperçu cela dans le canton de Fribourg. J'ai demandé au contributeur d'analyser ce qui s'est passé. En attendant il serrait prudent d'analyser l'étendue des dégâts There is a significant problem with this changeset It affected 2667 nodes, some of which are wrongly moved. I see somes in Fribourg. I asked the contributor to analyze what happened. Meanwhile it would be prudent to analyze the extent of the damage

1 0

Re: [talk-ch] qa.poole.ch improvement [was: addr:housenumber building⁼garage]
by marc marc 22 Jul '17

22 Jul '17

Simon what do you think about this idea ? Le 16. 06. 17 à 12:29, Marc M. a écrit : > There is the noaddress=yes tag (low usage) > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noaddress > > Edit of the wiki page made on May 6 by Dcapillae give the impression > that the tool already used it > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Qa.poole.ch_(QA_tool) > > It would be useful that qa tool use it. For example > dashed red for unsigned=yes on building in red right now > dashed orange for unsigned=yes on building in orange right now > blank for (EDIT) noaddress=yes > > Regards, > Marc > > Le 15. 06. 17 à 23:20, Simon Poole a écrit : >> I don't believe there is an established tag for the absence of an >> address currently. If there is, there would be no issue in supporting it. >> >> Simon >> >> >> Am 15.06.2017 um 22:37 schrieb marc marc: >>> Bonsoir, >>> >>> English version below >>> >>> en zone rurale, il est fréquent d'avoir un building⁼garage physiquement >>> séparé du building=house. Si on ajoute addr:housenumber sur la maison, >>> qa.poole.ch signale à juste titre que le garage n'a pas d'adresse même >>> si celui-ci est marqué avec noaddress=yes. >>> Quel est la meilleur façon de lier le garage à l'adresse de la maison >>> concernée ? >>> >>> In rural area, it is common to have a building⁼garage that is physically >>> separated from the building=house. when tag addr:housenumber on the >>> house, qa.pole.ch correctly points out that the garage has still no >>> address even if it is marked with noaddress=yes. >>> What is the best method to link the garage to the address of the related >>> house ? >>> >>> ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317094370 >>> >>> Cordialement, >>> Regards, >>> Marc >>> _______________________________________________ >>> talk-ch mailing list >>> talk-ch(a)openstreetmap.ch >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk-ch mailing list >> talk-ch(a)openstreetmap.ch >> http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch >> >

1 0

TTN Mapper
by Andreas Bürki 20 Jul '17

20 Jul '17

Hello Nice use case http://ttnmapper.org/ cheeers, h. -- Andreas Bürki abuerki(a)anidor.com S/MIME certificate - SHA-256 fingerprint: 8A:1A:C2:93:10:4B:CE:91:2C:80:79:44:24:1D:38:CA:EE:0E:89:C9:A5:A4:A0:03:FF:5A:FB:D1:15:18:B5:45 GnuPG - GPG fingerprint: 5DA7 5F48 25BD D2D7 E488 05DF 5A99 A321 7E42 0227

3 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

talk-ch July 2017