Hi all
I noticed today that in large parts of the Valais forests are mapped up to the tree tops. So extremely detailed. Example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526799342 (check it in satellite view)
What do you think about it? Does this still make sense?
The user is still mapping in this way.
Cheers!
Looks nice to me, in such meadows I've also seen micromappers adding a lot of singular natural=tree. That doesn't bother me, for outdoor use this gives a good idea on how it looks on the ground. Plus, with such level of detail, one can't really be afraid to see the database explosing with node: it takes so much time! Yves
Le 26 juin 2022 16:20:38 GMT+02:00, Kt47uo5uVzW kt47uo5uVzW@protonmail.com a écrit :
Hi all
I noticed today that in large parts of the Valais forests are mapped up to the tree tops. So extremely detailed. Example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526799342 (check it in satellite view)
What do you think about it? Does this still make sense?
The user is still mapping in this way.
Cheers!
Thx. It's noted. See thread "vandalism under the pretense of "simplifying".
-- Stefan
Am So., 26. Juni 2022 um 16:20 Uhr schrieb Kt47uo5uVzW kt47uo5uVzW@protonmail.com:
Hi all
I noticed today that in large parts of the Valais forests are mapped up to the tree tops. So extremely detailed. Example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526799342 (check it in satellite view)
What do you think about it? Does this still make sense?
The user is still mapping in this way.
Cheers! _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
-
Kt47uo5uVzW -
Stefan Keller -
Yves