The license working group essentially gave it's OK to start replacing data from mappers that have not agreed to the contributor terms in their meeting yesterday.
It seems a bit early to me, considering there are still roughly 80 mappers per day agreeing to the CTs, but in any case we slowly need to come to a community consensus on how we will want to handle this phase.
However before we do that, it seems reasonable to me to make a last effort to get in contact with mappers (Switzerland) that haven't responded yet. I've compiled a list of the mappers missing from the top 1076 mappers in Switzerland (this corresponds to 99% of the data) so that we can do this in a systematic fashion
The list has a total of 224 names, but I've removed some special cases, so probably around 220 that should be checked. Please have a look through the list and check if you know any of theses personally or at least could get in contact with them. There are some obvious cases (mapping party in Vevey and similar) that should be easily fixable.
The list is located on our ODBL status page: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/EN:Switzerland/ODBL_Status#Missing_Contri...
Simon
I've mailed not quite two hundred of the mappers that are clearly German speakers in the list yesterday and today, the response is quite good. There are around 20 probable French speakers that should be contacted and a couple of Italian. This is a supposedly a crowd sourced project, so I would suggest that it makes most sense for a native speaker of the language to try to reach them and not me (I'll handle the unclear and English speaking cases).
Simon
Am 20.07.2011 18:21, schrieb Simon Poole:
The license working group essentially gave it's OK to start replacing data from mappers that have not agreed to the contributor terms in their meeting yesterday.
It seems a bit early to me, considering there are still roughly 80 mappers per day agreeing to the CTs, but in any case we slowly need to come to a community consensus on how we will want to handle this phase.
However before we do that, it seems reasonable to me to make a last effort to get in contact with mappers (Switzerland) that haven't responded yet. I've compiled a list of the mappers missing from the top 1076 mappers in Switzerland (this corresponds to 99% of the data) so that we can do this in a systematic fashion
The list has a total of 224 names, but I've removed some special cases, so probably around 220 that should be checked. Please have a look through the list and check if you know any of theses personally or at least could get in contact with them. There are some obvious cases (mapping party in Vevey and similar) that should be easily fixable.
The list is located on our ODBL status page: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/EN:Switzerland/ODBL_Status#Missing_Contri...
Simon
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
Hi,
On 07/20/2011 06:21 PM, Simon Poole wrote:
The list has a total of 224 names, but I've removed some special cases, so probably around 220 that should be checked. Please have a look through the list and check if you know any of theses personally or at least could get in contact with them. There are some obvious cases (mapping party in Vevey and similar) that should be easily fixable.
The user account used during this mapping party in Vevey has just agreed to the relicensing! Thanks for pointing this out.
Cheers,
François
Spam detection software, running on the system "magnolia.poole.ch", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see The administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Thanks We are now down to 141 names from 224. If somebody could produce a reasonable French version of my text (most important the subject), I'll send it out. [...]
Content analysis details: (7.8 points, 4.0 required)
pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 2.3 MANGLED_LIST BODY: mangled list 2.3 MANGLED_MEN BODY: mangled men 2.3 MANGLED_LINKS BODY: mangled link(s) 2.3 MANGLED_LICNSD BODY: mangled license(d)
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
[I already sent this once before, but my spam filter decided not to like me]
Thanks François
We are now down to 137 names from 224.
If somebody could produce a reasonable French version of my text (most important the subject), I'll send it out. Rather than send the text out again to the list, whoever volunteers can just send me a mail.
Simon
Am 25.07.2011 17:20, schrieb Francois Deppierraz:
Hi,
On 07/20/2011 06:21 PM, Simon Poole wrote:
The list has a total of 224 names, but I've removed some special cases, so probably around 220 that should be checked. Please have a look through the list and check if you know any of theses personally or at least could get in contact with them. There are some obvious cases (mapping party in Vevey and similar) that should be easily fixable.
The user account used during this mapping party in Vevey has just agreed to the relicensing! Thanks for pointing this out.
Cheers,
François _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch