Hi all,
In this area, the boundary (Cossonay) and the river (La Venoge) share the same location.
Would be correct to merge the nodes in this section? (they are strongly related) Or align the nodes without a merge, or do nothing ...
Thanks,
fredj
Hi fredj
I'm not sure, but I would merge. Why? In general, the centerof a river ist he boundary of e region. With the tag on the river (or a part with splitting the line), it's set automaticly tot he center.
I just checked in some other regions (France, germany) with larger and smaler rivers, and all I've seen is that it's a river with the boundary tag.
Regards, David
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: talk-ch-bounces@openstreetmap.ch [mailto:talk-ch-bounces@openstreetmap.ch] Im Auftrag von Frédéric Junod Gesendet: Freitag, 3. August 2012 11:04 An: talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Betreff: [talk-ch] boundary and river node merge
Hi all,
In this area, the boundary (Cossonay) and the river (La Venoge) share the same location.
Would be correct to merge the nodes in this section? (they are strongly related) Or align the nodes without a merge, or do nothing ...
Thanks,
fredj _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
Hi David
Be careful. In most cases the waterway WAS identical to the border when fixing them. But if a river changes his bed, the border doesn't change automatically. Imagine your real estate will change after each heavy rain :-)
So I would not change the border, because it is an import from official data and I would draw the waterway from aerial images completely independent.
Regards, Michael
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: talk-ch-bounces@openstreetmap.ch [mailto:talk-ch-bounces@openstreetmap.ch] Im Auftrag von David Däster Gesendet: Freitag, 3. August 2012 11:16 An: 'Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra' Betreff: Re: [talk-ch] boundary and river node merge
Hi fredj
I'm not sure, but I would merge. Why? In general, the centerof a river ist he boundary of e region. With the tag on the river (or a part with splitting the line), it's set automaticly tot he center.
I just checked in some other regions (France, germany) with larger and smaler rivers, and all I've seen is that it's a river with the boundary tag.
Regards, David
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: talk-ch-bounces@openstreetmap.ch [mailto:talk-ch-bounces@openstreetmap.ch] Im Auftrag von Frédéric Junod Gesendet: Freitag, 3. August 2012 11:04 An: talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch Betreff: [talk-ch] boundary and river node merge
Hi all,
In this area, the boundary (Cossonay) and the river (La Venoge) share the same location.
Would be correct to merge the nodes in this section? (they are strongly related) Or align the nodes without a merge, or do nothing ...
Thanks,
fredj _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
_______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
Please DON'T merge, in fact please do not merge ANYTHING with boundaries from the SwissTopo import.
Reasons:
- boundaries tend to be historic and mostly reflect old river beds, roads etc.
- the SwissTopo data was simplified on import
- merging the data increases the probability of editing errors impacting the boundaries by a gigantic amount
Simon
Am 03.08.2012 11:04, schrieb Frédéric Junod:
Hi all,
In this area, the boundary (Cossonay) and the river (La Venoge) share the same location.
Would be correct to merge the nodes in this section? (they are strongly related) Or align the nodes without a merge, or do nothing ...
Thanks,
fredj _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Simon Poole simon@poole.ch wrote:
Please DON'T merge, in fact please do not merge ANYTHING with boundaries from the SwissTopo import.
Reasons:
- boundaries tend to be historic and mostly reflect old river beds,
roads etc.
the SwissTopo data was simplified on import
merging the data increases the probability of editing errors impacting
the boundaries by a gigantic amount
It makes good sense. Thanks for the input.
fredj
Simon
Am 03.08.2012 11:04, schrieb Frédéric Junod:
Hi all,
In this area, the boundary (Cossonay) and the river (La Venoge) share the same location.
Would be correct to merge the nodes in this section? (they are strongly related) Or align the nodes without a merge, or do nothing ...
Thanks,
fredj _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch