English text below
Hallo zusammen
Ich habe eine Software geschrieben, welche es erlaubt, in GWR-Datensätzen die in OSM bereits erfassten Adressen zu entfernen. Ziel ist es, den Import von GWR-Daten zu vereinfachen. Die Software gibt es hier: https://gitlab.com/ltog/gwr-filter/
Gerne nehme ich euer Feedback entgegen.
Grüsse
Lukas
Hi all
I wrote a piece of software that allows to process GWR datasets: Addresses already known in OSM will be removed in the output. This should simplify the import of GWR data into OSM. You can find the software at https://gitlab.com/ltog/gwr-filter/ .
I'd like to hear your feedback.
Best regards
Lukas
Hello,
Le 25.12.19 à 21:49, Toggenburger Lukas a écrit :
I'd like to hear your feedback.
ho *YES* ! I 'm very happy to see somebody writing a such tools, because every time I want to add some addr, I first run a conflate to avoid already existing addr.
about "Addresses with housenumbers [object Object]" : I never see it but where are they created? It would be a good idea to delete them as as early as possible in the pipeline, probably in Simon's tool.
about osm data : about the data source, is it possible to make an overpass query? downloading an extract from the whole of switzerland to compare the addresses of a municipality is not very efficient. maybe Simon also has this extract for his site. otherwise it could also be the occasion to add an extract on the association's website, a little like BANO for France. a test an overpass export to .osm
about the criteria: what is the basis for exclusion? no+street+proximity?
about the schema: does the tool also support 4819 existing associatedStreet ? addr on node or way or relation ?
I'll test it in the next few days, I'll let you know.
Regards, Marc
ho *YES* ! I 'm very happy to see somebody writing a such tools
Glad to hear that...
about "Addresses with housenumbers [object Object]" : I never see it but where are they created?
I'm not quite sure. @Simon: Can you elaborate?
about osm data : about the data source, is it possible to make an overpass query? downloading an extract from the whole of Switzerland to compare the addresses of a municipality is not very efficient.
It shouldn't be too hard to do that but I didn't try it (yet).
does the tool also support 4819 existing associatedStreet ?
Not yet. I can add it if there is interest... However, personally I'd rather work into the direction of reaching a (Switzerland-wide) consensus to ban these relations and have a uniform way of storing addresses.
Currently the software works like this:
- Get the position of all nodes/centroids of ways with addr:housenumber=... and either addr:street=... or addr:place=... - Store these entries as pairs of streetname + housenumber - Return those entries of the GWR data, which don't have a close (ca. 250m) match (comparing streetname+housenumber) in the aforementioned pairs. (Some steps (e.g. street name normalization) are performed to rather remove too many entries than too little.)
I'll test it in the next few days, I'll let you know.
Cool, thank you!
Lukas
_______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
-
marc marc -
Toggenburger Lukas