On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:24:15PM +0200, datendelphin wrote:

Hi Andrew

Usually, the algorithm considers bus and tram the same type. This is because in most places, didok does not make a difference between bus stops and tram stops. But Basel seems the exception. I will make an exception for the matching, that "BLT Auto" will only match bus stops.

But it won't work in most places, because I "group" the OSM stops before I make the matching. And I can't make the exception for the grouping, because OSM stops seldom have an operator entry. It would need a very different algorithm to handle just this exception, so I say we make it by hand.

That worked well. Unfortunally, it seems that the data in Basel is especially inconsistent. Have a look here at Luzernerring:

http://osm.lonvia.de/didok.html?zoom=17&lat=47.5663&lon=7.5649&l...

It seems that when BLT Auto (a bus) and BVB (a tram) share a stop there is only one entry. I really don't see any way to fix Basel up automatically. I've corrected a few obvious mistakes but it would really help if somebody from Basel could check (and potentially fix) all stops along the tram lines.

Gruss

Sarah

On 19.10.2010 19:00, Andrew Lunn wrote:

...

Hi Folks

It seems there has been a mix up in Baselland with buses and trams. e.g.

http://osm.lonvia.de/didok.html?zoom=17&lat=47.493&lon=7.58992&l...

The BLT Auto point has been connected to the OSM tram stop, and the BLT point has been left disconnected.

same as:

http://osm.lonvia.de/didok.html?zoom=17&lat=47.50137&lon=7.61946&...

etc.

Is it possible to globally change BLT auto to type bus and re-run the matching algorithm?

Thanks
Andrew

---

talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch

---

talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch