Could somebody local have a look at these edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/cadastre%20Fribourg ?
Not being "official" is defintely not a reason to remove information from OSM and given the name of the user they may be using external sources for the edits.
Simon
On 26.08.2017 09:33, Simon Poole wrote:
Could somebody local have a look at these edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/cadastre%20Fribourg ?
Not being "official" is defintely not a reason to remove information from OSM and given the name of the user they may be using external sources for the edits.
While I'm not local, I remember that area https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1685743788 from our mapping party there. I can't remember whether there was any on-the-ground indication of /just/ the name "Matte" or "La Planche", but there's certainly many features around called "Obere Matte" / "Planche-Supérieure" and "Untere Matte" / "Planche-Inférieure" (many of which we entered or verified during the mapping party), so that an overall name "Matte" / "(La) Planche" seems at least very plausible.
Also, seeing that this name deletion left behind an otherwise empty place=locality node (IMHO semantically nonsense) indicates that this user might need some pointers on where to look up OSM tagging and mapping conventions/schemes. (I've provided them some (specific ones) on their other edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51424736. Hope my French is somewhat intelligible. :-!;-))
Regards, Raphael
Le 26. 08. 17 à 11:39, Raphael Das Gupta (das-g) a écrit :
On 26.08.2017 09:33, Simon Poole wrote:
Could somebody local have a look at these edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/cadastre%20Fribourg ?
I put a comment on the first changeset
an overall name "Matte" / "(La) Planche" seems at least very plausible.
+1 for the name but for place=locality, wiki said "unpopulated place" maybe it is not the name that need to be removed but change to place=neighbourhood ? Is an industrial / commercial zone unpopulated but in the city ? imho no.
this user might need some pointers on where to look up OSM tagging and mapping conventions/schemes.may be we need a "osm tutorial" in French. maybe it already exist
The welcome message have a link to "map features" but not to a tutorial
Le 26. 08. 17 à 11:39, Raphael Das Gupta (das-g) a écrit :
Hope my French is somewhat intelligible.
you get a 5.5/6 :) vois -> voir (ou lisez)
BTW it does actually seem to be the cadastre Fribourg.
Which reminds me: on my, very very long, todo list I have an item "orthophotos Fribourg".
We used to have access to imagery from 2005 that has since disappeared, but there is more current imagery that would be nice if we could use them legally (and it was provided either as image files that we could host ourselves, or via an WMS that we could proxy, technically iirc they are now only available via an arcgis server of sorts).
If somebody feels like taking this up with the cantonal GIS office please feel free to do so.
Simon
Am 27.08.2017 um 14:43 schrieb marc marc:
Le 27. 08. 17 à 14:30, Simon Poole a écrit :
BTW it does actually seem to be the cadastre Fribourg.
Yes, I naively hope that this will reopen the discussion on opendata access to their data :-) _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
I know that they do not like multiple requests… Had a discussion two years ago and the „no“ wasn’t really categoric.
regards gerard
Am 27.08.2017 um 15:28 schrieb Simon Poole simon@poole.ch:
Which reminds me: on my, very very long, todo list I have an item "orthophotos Fribourg".
We used to have access to imagery from 2005 that has since disappeared, but there is more current imagery that would be nice if we could use them legally (and it was provided either as image files that we could host ourselves, or via an WMS that we could proxy, technically iirc they are now only available via an arcgis server of sorts).
If somebody feels like taking this up with the cantonal GIS office please feel free to do so.
Simon
Am 27.08.2017 um 14:43 schrieb marc marc:
Le 27. 08. 17 à 14:30, Simon Poole a écrit :
BTW it does actually seem to be the cadastre Fribourg.
Yes, I naively hope that this will reopen the discussion on opendata access to their data :-) _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
Am 27.08.2017 um 15:28 schrieb Simon Poole:
Which reminds me: on my, very very long, todo list I have an item "orthophotos Fribourg".
I just checked the DigitalGlobe "Standard" imagery is quite good at least for Fribourg itself. Far better than Bing.
Hi
Probably "cadastre fribourg" is from the city and not the canton...
Regards Gérard
von unterwegs gesendet ...
Am 28.08.2017 um 09:46 schrieb Simon Poole simon@poole.ch:
Am 27.08.2017 um 15:28 schrieb Simon Poole:
Which reminds me: on my, very very long, todo list I have an item "orthophotos Fribourg".
I just checked the DigitalGlobe "Standard" imagery is quite good at least for Fribourg itself. Far better than Bing.
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
-
Gerard -
marc marc -
Raphael Das Gupta (das-g) -
Simon Poole