Hello everyone
I've now also looked at all edits by user unare-314. Most of them were problematical (import of copyright protected objects), but at least they have all been reverted (thank you, Marc!). Nearly all of his problematical edits have also been censored (redacted) with the exception of the following edits, the imported objects of which still need to be deleted:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15660935 - import of 476 rivers and streams with source="Hydrologique Canton Fribourg" (has been reverted with changeset 15677529, but not deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15660939 - import of 902 rivers and streams with source="Hydrologique Canton Fribourg" (has been reverted with changeset 15677523, but not deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15660956 - import of 582 rivers and streams with source="Hydrologique Canton Fribourg" (has been reveted with changeset 15677503, but not deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15661022 - import of 50,000 nodes without tags (has been reverted by the user itself with changesets 15668839, 15669855, 15670004 and 15670012) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15661023 - import of 329 rivers and streams with source="Hydrologique Canton Fribourg" (has been reverted with changeset 15661724, but not deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15661025 - import of 466 rivers and streams with source="Hydrologique Canton Fribourg" (has been reverted with changeset 15661588, but not deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15661027 - import of 766 rivers and streams with source="Hydrologique Canton Fribourg" (has been reverted with changeset 15661587, but not deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15661028 - import of 573 rivers and streams with source="Hydrologique Canton Fribourg" (has been reverted with changeset 15661583, but not deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15661030 - import of 573 rivers and streams with source="Hydrologique Canton Fribourg" (has been reverted with changeset 15661579, but not deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15661031 - import of 522 rivers and streams with source="Hydrologique Canton Fribourg" (has been reverted with changeset 15661572, but not deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15661032 - import of 235 rivers and streams with source="Hydrologique Canton Fribourg" (has been reverted with changeset 15661568, but not deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15661033 - import of 312 rivers and streams with source="Hydrologique Canton Fribourg" (has been reverted with changeset 15661565, but not deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15661122 - import of 647 rivers and streams with source="Hydrologique Canton Fribourg" (has been reverted with changeset 15661535, but not deleted)
Marc M. wrote:
What shall we do?
- Keep them and trying to repair things?
it is necessary (as there were already some buildings before these problematic imports)
If i understand you right, this would mean that some (or all) illegal elements would remain. I think this isn't an option.
Should i report the collected, problematical edits to the DWG? (I guess it won't help if i revert the problematical edits of users mousse and bulla and the DWG later removes the illegal version from the database.)
Best regards
Raphael
On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 16:59, Marc M. marc_marc_irc@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Le 11.03.23 à 17:56, Lukas Toggenburger a écrit :
I've checked all 20 edits of user bulla. All but one of his edits seem problematical
What shall we do?
- Keep them and trying to repair things?
it is necessary (as there were already some buildings before these problematic imports)
- Remove them (maybe with help from DWG),
removing duplicates is necessary I am testing with josm, in some cases it offers a one-click repair that deletes the 2nd building, in other cases you have to repair manually. I will open a ticket to see if josm can be improved to correct the trivial cases automatically in total there are 755 duplicate buildings to delete. the other solution is an integral revert, the problem is that the 4 accounts make multiple imports problematic since 2013 and that it is thus difficult to keep what is legitimate
optionally do a PotM
if we want a "high-quality", "low false positive" revert, yes maybe
- Something else?
reverse the logic:
- ask these 4 users if there is anything from an osm compatible source
(in the past, no positive response)
- delete all the buildings of these users (except hypothetical buildings
with a valid source)
- make the procedure for an import from the microsoft building database
- addrs from RegBl
but I must confess that I am tired of intervening for the 4th time on this same problem in the same place (and maybe with the same guy) and in the future, to avoid detecting this problem so late, it would be necessary to spend time correcting the errors present in the database, that would make it possible to see immediately a brutal increase in the number of anomalies and make a revert without lost/damage/conflict/...
Regards, Marc _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch