Hello Simon,
first of all thank you for taking into account the previous feedback and filtering the streets supposedly inhabited but without address. it helps a lot to focus on the most useful streets to add first (in my opinion).
However, I saw the opposite problem: a new street with 2 inhabited houses, is missing from the GWR<>osm summary but available both on the cantonal and federal site. is it possible to add the date of the GWR data on the page http://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/ or to indicate the frequency of download of the federal file? it would help to know if it is because the tool has not download the file recently or if it is "out of osm" that the update has not yet been done.
Regards, Marc
On 06.12.19 10:22, Simon Poole wrote:
I've updated the address data on http://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/ to the current GWR address data.
There is one, larger, change from the previous update (mid-2019). As it seems to be a trend to add ancillary buildings now with house numbers in the format/number/*.*/number /I've removed them from both the statistics and the generated files, this removes a good 200'000 addresses from the current dataset (note if somebody wants this data I can generate files with them included).
This, naturally, doesn't address the problem with non-postal house numbers and the different ways of handling them in general, put should limit the effect it has to the places and cantons that are not using a numbering scheme that doesn't differentiate these in format.
Simon