Hi Phono
Thanks for your answer. It helped. I was planing to join the Stammtisch today but didn't make it to Zurich in time. Next month.
Cheers Pascal
On 01.01.2012 20:25, phono wrote:
Hi Pascal,
A good place to discuss such things is the monthly meeting (Stammtisch) in Zürich which usually takes place on 11th every month near the bqm at ETH. (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Switzerland:Z%C3%BCrich/OSM-Treffen)
- Administrative boundaries: around Albisriederplatz the boarders are
set as a separate way on top of the tramway way. It's very hard to select the right one. Shouldn't that be merged to one way only? Or set as relation? BTW there seems to be a problem with the boundaries anyway, as they are not closed.
Administrative Boundaries are imported from an official data source. As they have nothing to do with tramways or other ways, they are treated separately. Dependent on what software you use for mapping, there are efficient ways to select overlapping ways.
- How are pedestrian crossings supposed to be tagged, when the
highway lanes are separated and there is a tramway in between? Should the lanes be connected or is it enough to simply put a crossing tag to all the nodes crossed?
In my opinion, a tag on all nodes should be sufficient. Connecting the lanes by a footway or path is kind of micromapping which makes only sense if all sidewalks have been mapped.
- I had to adjust some public transport relations due to the changes
I made. I noticed that there are always to relation per bus line (at least for 33 and 72). Is that the way it's supposed to be?
There is a relation for each direction of the bus line. The 33 for example uses different ways near Wollishofen.
cheers, p
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch