Hello,
Le 11.03.23 à 17:56, Lukas Toggenburger a écrit :
I've checked all 20 edits of user bulla. All but one of his edits seem problematical
What shall we do?
- Keep them and trying to repair things?
it is necessary (as there were already some buildings before these problematic imports)
- Remove them (maybe with help from DWG),
removing duplicates is necessary I am testing with josm, in some cases it offers a one-click repair that deletes the 2nd building, in other cases you have to repair manually. I will open a ticket to see if josm can be improved to correct the trivial cases automatically in total there are 755 duplicate buildings to delete. the other solution is an integral revert, the problem is that the 4 accounts make multiple imports problematic since 2013 and that it is thus difficult to keep what is legitimate
optionally do a PotM
if we want a "high-quality", "low false positive" revert, yes maybe
- Something else?
reverse the logic: - ask these 4 users if there is anything from an osm compatible source (in the past, no positive response) - delete all the buildings of these users (except hypothetical buildings with a valid source) - make the procedure for an import from the microsoft building database + addrs from RegBl
but I must confess that I am tired of intervening for the 4th time on this same problem in the same place (and maybe with the same guy) and in the future, to avoid detecting this problem so late, it would be necessary to spend time correcting the errors present in the database, that would make it possible to see immediately a brutal increase in the number of anomalies and make a revert without lost/damage/conflict/...
Regards, Marc