The licence isn't clear enought to make a import right now. But to use it, several tools can be used : - I'm trying conflator pluging in josm (manuel check that everbody can do right now). I export missing to a .osm file to use it in the next tools. - create a umap with the previous .osm file. I 'll use it as a tips to make a survey.
when the licence 'll be ok, I think we need to use 2 tools : - create a import for all addr that are inside a building outline only if the building have only one addr from gwr and only if the building doesn't have any addr tag on or in the outline - use osmose to show addr that failed to be imported. vespucci editor can show osmose alert by proximity. so everbody can check on site building that need to be splited or create entrance or assign addr to correct building or put error in "false".
In addition to this, the import of building outline for the canton of Bern should be continued. does anyone have any idea how long that would take at the current rate ?
Le 01. 01. 18 à 22:36, michael spreng a écrit :
Hi
I don't think there are specific plans yet. See Simons remark about finishing Bern first. In my opinion, a first step would be a nice comparison map. For example showing missing addresses or deviations. That would give us a better feeling for the data. It would also help local mappers to improve on coverage. We will get the best results when we can help and encourage local mappers to do addresses.
Michael
On 31/12/17 22:09, Toggenburger Lukas wrote:
Hello Simon
Are there already plans/ideas on how we would import the GWR addresses without having duplicates from already existing addresses, etc? What options do we have?
I offer my programming skills to help.
Es guets neus!
Lukas _______________________________________________ talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch