Nov 14, 2022, 09:09 by marc_marc_irc@hotmail.com:
Hello,
Le 13.11.22 à 21:47, Imagoiq a écrit :
- Do we have local rules for Wikidata/Wikipedia
my reply isn't about local rule :)
- Do you expect wikipedia tag to present if possible or is linking
with just wikidata considered as OK? 2. Do you expect wikidata tag to present if possible or is linking with just wikipedia considered as OK?
osm is made with human readable strings and the first "rule" goes against it. i have no problem with an object having a WP tag without wikidata tag.
however, i think that there is no interest to report a "wikidata without wikipedia" nor a "wikipedia without wikipedia" to a human, it's a non-problem that doesn't deserve to spend time on it in my eyes, the user of the data who would like to use one or the other knows easily to find the other element if it is missing. I have no objection to a mechanical edition that would add the missing tag but I don't see any point in it either, the one who uses the data should add it at that moment to take into account the new cases.
For me main benefits are - of adding wikipedia tag: data becomes human readable - of adding wikidata tag: makes easier to fix wikipedia tag in case where Wikidata editors decided to rename article (moves related to dashes, emdashes, brackets and similar are really liked by some)
See https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/Schweiz%20-... that could be fixed with automatic edit rather with manual one thanks to presence of wikidata confirming the target of redirect.
- Automation for some "obvious" edits
Do you see something that is clearly wrong and that should be edited? Do you have something against that?
I'm in favour of automated corrections when possible. However, I haven't looked at the list of what he's proposing, and at the guideline level, if he wants to make a mechanical edition, he might as well announce it while respecting the rules.
I was trying to probe individual user to check whether asking entire community makes sense. I guess that I could phrase my question more clearly.
If that would be discussed already and decided then proposing bot edit would make no sense.
Right now no bot edit is being proposed, and would be clearly proposed. No matter answers in this discussion: I would not consider it as approving of any automated edit.