Hello,
Sorry for long time to respond.
I understand your opinion about the licence, but in in Lausanne we have an orthophoto than I put it on the building mapped on with the orthophoto. Than I think thats OK.
But for the others places should I remove them ?
CU Stéphane
Marc Schneider a écrit :
Am 12.03.2010 23:29, schrieb Sarah Hoffmann:
Sounds to me, like it is very similar to GeoNames and there the consensus is that it is not a valid source. Read more here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geonames
Sarah
agree with you! the curcial information (geo location) is derived from google aerial imagery / maps. I don't see how that is compatible with our OSM license model.
the only thing we can do is check which data was "sponsored" (e.g. Zug has been mentioned previously?) and contact those people directly in order to receive the rights to import their (raw!) data into OSM. But I'm clearly against a direct import of openaddress data, no matter where it came from.
If a decision has been made we should set up a wiki page (like the geonames one) and edit the pages listing openaddresses as a potential data source.
Marc.
talk-ch mailing list talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch