talk-ch

talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch

3 participants
2220 discussions

Re: [talk-ch] Open Data Kanton Luzern
by Peter Berger 19 Jan '22

19 Jan '22

Hat sonst jemand Erfahrung mit CloudCompare und den Las-Files von Swisstopo? Würde gerne mich darüber austauschen. Gruss, Peter Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 14.01.2022 um 17:24 schrieb Peter Berger <peter.berger(a)bluewin.ch>: > > > Es scheint, dass die Lidardaten von Luzern bei Swisstopo bereits die Versionen 2019/2020 beinhalten. > > Ein sehr gutes Tool für Lidardaten ist CloudCompare, CloudCompare - Open Source project > > Für die Analyse und auch das Erstellen von Höhenmodelle, z.B. nur Boden oder mit Vegetation oder nur Häuser kann man entsprechende Filter setzen und danach ein Höhenmodell generieren. Oder auch ein Hillshade. > > In QGIS kann man dies meiner Erfahrung nach leider nicht. Dort kann man jedoch die LAS/LAZ -Files laden und auch Filter setzen. Oder dann ein von CloudCompare generiertes Höhenmodell laden und ein Hillshade daraus erstellen. > > Gruss, Peter > > Von: talk-ch <talk-ch-bounces(a)openstreetmap.ch> Im Auftrag von René Buffat > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Januar 2022 21:21 > An: Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra <talk-ch(a)openstreetmap.ch>; sentalize(a)yahoo.de > Betreff: Re: [talk-ch] Open Data Kanton Luzern > > Swisstopo hat den Kanton Luzern [1] in der Periode 2019-2020 mit Lidar abgeflogen. Die Punktwolke kann man bereits herunterladen[2] und im swissSurface3d hillshade sind die Daten auch schon enthalten[3]. Ich vermute, das swissAlti3D DTM wird in einem der nächsten Releases mit diesen Daten aktualisiert. > > lg rene > > [1] https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/content/swisstopo-internet/de/geodata/height… > [2] https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/de/geodata/height/surface3d.html > [3] https://map.geo.admin.ch/?lang=en&topic=ech&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte… > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 18:46, Simon Poole <simon(a)poole.ch> wrote: > Das DTM scheint ein Bezahlprodukt zu sein https://geoportal.lu.ch/-/media/RAWI/Dokumente/Downloads/geoinformation/mb_… > > Am 13.01.2022 um 14:49 schrieb Sentalize: > Das ist genial ... Luzern fiel mir immer als ziemlich rückständig auf, was Versatz usw angeht .. da half schon Swissimage enorm. Wie ich sehe, hat es auch ein Terrainmodell aus 2018. Das wär äusserst hilfreich. Mal sehen, ob man das irgendwo als WMS findet. > > Am Donnerstag, 13. Januar 2022, 14:22:56 MEZ hat Simon Poole <simon(a)poole.ch> Folgendes geschrieben: > > > Eine gute Nachricht aus der Innerschweiz: der Kanton Luzern hat Anfangs > Jahr auch angefangen seine Geodaten zu offen Bedingungen freizugeben. > > Siehe https://geoportal.lu.ch/geodaten > > Dies ist umso mehr bemerkenswert als der Kanton über Jahre hinweg massiv > gegen Open Data opponiert hat (von den Gerüchten die jeweils gestreut > wurden bezüglich OSM will ich gar nicht anfangen). > > Natürlich gibt es auch hier eine Schattenseite: es sieht aktuell so aus > als ob die Nutzungsbedingungen eine direkte Nutzung in OSM nicht > erlauben, das übliche Quellenhinweisproblem. Falls aber jemand einen > Datensatz speziell interessant findet, kläre ich das gerne ab. > > Simon > > _______________________________________________ > talk-ch mailing list > talk-ch(a)openstreetmap.ch > http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch > > _______________________________________________ > talk-ch mailing list > talk-ch(a)openstreetmap.ch > http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch > _______________________________________________ > talk-ch mailing list > talk-ch(a)openstreetmap.ch > http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch

1 0

Open Data Kanton Luzern
by Simon Poole 18 Jan '22

18 Jan '22

Eine gute Nachricht aus der Innerschweiz: der Kanton Luzern hat Anfangs Jahr auch angefangen seine Geodaten zu offen Bedingungen freizugeben. Siehe https://geoportal.lu.ch/geodaten Dies ist umso mehr bemerkenswert als der Kanton über Jahre hinweg massiv gegen Open Data opponiert hat (von den Gerüchten die jeweils gestreut wurden bezüglich OSM will ich gar nicht anfangen). Natürlich gibt es auch hier eine Schattenseite: es sieht aktuell so aus als ob die Nutzungsbedingungen eine direkte Nutzung in OSM nicht erlauben, das übliche Quellenhinweisproblem. Falls aber jemand einen Datensatz speziell interessant findet, kläre ich das gerne ab. Simon

6 12

motorway network
by Martin Machyna 17 Jan '22

17 Jan '22

Hi everyone, I saw that your road relations for motorways are under the network name "motorway". So far no one has claimed that name elsewhere, but maybe it might be safer if you'd move it to something more specific like "CH:motorway". Cheers Martin

1 0

Is it possible to adapt the "to" member of a "destination_sign" tag?
by Raphaël Terrettaz 11 Jan '22

11 Jan '22

Hello, As I read in the Wiki, the "to" member of a "destination_sign" tag can contain a way or a node. In my current review of hiking trails, I would like to put a relation inside. Here is a real example : I've created a hiking route between 2 guideposts : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13273890 I've also created a destination_sign to indicate the destination and time. I use the first point of the way to indicate the "to" : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13276408 When I display the map, I can only seen 2 circles. That will not really help users. In the destination_sign I could indicate the first way, it will be little more explicit. But if I could enter the relation to the destination in the "to", there would be a great gain of information. Do you know why the "to" member is not accepting a relation ? Is it possible to change it ? Thank you Raphael Terrettaz

3 5

Re: [talk-ch] Switzerland-specific tagging of schools
by James Bell 09 Jan '22

09 Jan '22

Hi, I'm no expert on the school system. Tagging vocational school type sounds interesting and I guess easier to check on the ground than diploma type. Were you thinking using an existing tag and e.g. amenity=college / school=professional_education / amenity=school and adding something to describe the type of vocation? E.g. school:studies Did you aready see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:amenity%3Dschool#school%3Atype ? Regards, James. On Sun, 9 Jan 2022, 12:00 , <talk-ch-request(a)openstreetmap.ch> wrote: > Send talk-ch mailing list submissions to > talk-ch(a)openstreetmap.ch > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > talk-ch-request(a)openstreetmap.ch > > You can reach the person managing the list at > talk-ch-owner(a)openstreetmap.ch > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of talk-ch digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Switzerland-specific tagging of schools (Toggenburger Lukas) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 20:38:27 +0000 > From: Toggenburger Lukas <Lukas.Toggenburger(a)fhgr.ch> > To: "talk-ch(a)openstreetmap.ch" <talk-ch(a)openstreetmap.ch> > Subject: [talk-ch] Switzerland-specific tagging of schools > Message-ID: <8ede2af993864320adc060e8099442b2(a)fhgr.ch> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Dear list > > I recently thought about creating a Switzerland-specific tagging scheme > that would allow to specify the different kinds of school that exist in > Switzerland. Wikipedia [1] gives a good introduction: However, it is > incomplete, as [2] shows (it lists 39 types of educations one can achieve > in Switzerland). I tried to create a summary and some tagging ideas at [3], > but got a bit stuck. I encountered several stumbling blocks: > > 1. Instead of tagging schools, it might make more sense to tag diplomas > one can achieve. E.g. at a vocational school (Berufsfachschule, ehemals > Berufsschule) you can do your diploma (vocational baccalaureate > ("Berufsmaturität")) _during_ your vocational training or _afterwards_. > > 2. The name of a school does not clearly indicate the diploma you will > achieve: E.g. at [4] (Fachmaturitätsschule FMS) one can achieve a > "Fachmittelschulausweis" (giving access to PET college (HF)) and later on > one can achieve a "Fachmaturitätszeugnis" (giving access to university of > applied science (FH)). > > 3. The same type of diploma can be achieved at different schools: Example: > [5] "Berufsmaturität" can be achieved at "Berufsfachschule", > "Handelsmittelschule", "Informatikmittelschule". > > Are others interested in defining such a Switzerland-specific tagging > scheme? I can think of several different strategies: > > a. Define types of school (e.g. "Berufsfachschule") and their tags > b. Define types of diplomas (e.g. "Berufsmaturität") and their tags > c. Group together several schools/diplomas, e.g. based on their ISCED > level, see [6] > d. Define tags for only the most important (i.e. frequent) schools > (preferably in a way that won't hinder more detailed mapping later on) > > I'm a bit hesitant too define a catch-all, super-detailed tagging scheme, > because I fear it will be both hard to map (correctly/completely) and also > hard to use for data consumers. > > What do you think? > > Also, is there someone who has a bit of in-depth knowledge of ISCED? E.g. > regarding the difference between ISCED-P and ISCED-A? > > Best regards > > Lukas > > [1] > https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bildungssystem_in_der_Schweiz#Schulstufen > [2] > http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/iscmap_che_2020.xlsx > [3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Skorbut > [4] https://www.edubs.ch/schullaufbahn/fms > [5] > https://www.zh.ch/de/bildung/schulen/maturitaetsschule/berufsmaturitaetssch… > [6] > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Classification_of_Educ… > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > talk-ch mailing list > talk-ch(a)openstreetmap.ch > http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch > > > ------------------------------ > > End of talk-ch Digest, Vol 2158, Issue 1 > **************************************** >

1 0

Switzerland-specific tagging of schools
by Toggenburger Lukas 08 Jan '22

08 Jan '22

Dear list I recently thought about creating a Switzerland-specific tagging scheme that would allow to specify the different kinds of school that exist in Switzerland. Wikipedia [1] gives a good introduction: However, it is incomplete, as [2] shows (it lists 39 types of educations one can achieve in Switzerland). I tried to create a summary and some tagging ideas at [3], but got a bit stuck. I encountered several stumbling blocks: 1. Instead of tagging schools, it might make more sense to tag diplomas one can achieve. E.g. at a vocational school (Berufsfachschule, ehemals Berufsschule) you can do your diploma (vocational baccalaureate ("Berufsmaturität")) _during_ your vocational training or _afterwards_. 2. The name of a school does not clearly indicate the diploma you will achieve: E.g. at [4] (Fachmaturitätsschule FMS) one can achieve a "Fachmittelschulausweis" (giving access to PET college (HF)) and later on one can achieve a "Fachmaturitätszeugnis" (giving access to university of applied science (FH)). 3. The same type of diploma can be achieved at different schools: Example: [5] "Berufsmaturität" can be achieved at "Berufsfachschule", "Handelsmittelschule", "Informatikmittelschule". Are others interested in defining such a Switzerland-specific tagging scheme? I can think of several different strategies: a. Define types of school (e.g. "Berufsfachschule") and their tags b. Define types of diplomas (e.g. "Berufsmaturität") and their tags c. Group together several schools/diplomas, e.g. based on their ISCED level, see [6] d. Define tags for only the most important (i.e. frequent) schools (preferably in a way that won't hinder more detailed mapping later on) I'm a bit hesitant too define a catch-all, super-detailed tagging scheme, because I fear it will be both hard to map (correctly/completely) and also hard to use for data consumers. What do you think? Also, is there someone who has a bit of in-depth knowledge of ISCED? E.g. regarding the difference between ISCED-P and ISCED-A? Best regards Lukas [1] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bildungssystem_in_der_Schweiz#Schulstufen [2] http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/iscmap_che_2020.xlsx [3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Skorbut [4] https://www.edubs.ch/schullaufbahn/fms [5] https://www.zh.ch/de/bildung/schulen/maturitaetsschule/berufsmaturitaetssch… [6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Classification_of_Educ…

1 0

FYI -> Inventar von Armee- und Kriegsdenkmälern in der Schweiz
by Andreas Bürki 07 Jan '22

07 Jan '22

Salut Vielleicht auch von Interesse für OSM Mapper (z.B. PotM ?) : Inventar von Armee- und Kriegsdenkmälern in der Schweiz https://www.admin.ch/gov/de/start/dokumentation/medienmitteilungen.msg-id-8… Diese Medienmitteilung der Schweizer Armee könnte für Wikipedianer von Interesse sein: "Die Schweizer Armee hat ein Inventar der in der Schweiz bestehenden Armee- und Kriegsdenkmäler erstellt und online publiziert. Das Verzeichnis schafft in digitaler Form einen Überblick über rund 900 Erinnerungszeichen. Sie rufen die alteidgenössischen Schlachten, die Aktivdienste des 20. Jahrhunderts oder Unglücke der Schweizer Armee ins Gedächtnis. Aufgeführt werden auch Denkmäler, die an die Internierten während der beiden Weltkriege oder an verstorbene Bourbaki-Soldaten erinnern." Erhalten via Hadi (Diego Hättenschwiler) / Wikiped'a -- Andreas Bürki abuerki(a)anidor.com S/MIME certificate - SHA-256 fingerprint: 8A:1A:C2:93:10:4B:CE:91:2C:80:79:44:24:1D:38:CA:EE:0E:89:C9:A5:A4:A0:03:FF:5A:FB:D1:15:18:B5:45 GnuPG - GPG fingerprint: 5DA7 5F48 25BD D2D7 E488 05DF 5A99 A321 7E42 0227

3 4

Virtueller OSM-Stammtisch: Montag, 11. Januar
by Patrick Stählin 05 Jan '22

05 Jan '22

Salut! Es ist wohl keine Überraschung: wir treffen uns wieder virtuell. Alles was ihr braucht ist ein Browser und ein Mikrofon. Ein Getränk eurer Wahl ist optional, aber empfehlenswert. Datum: Dienstag, 11. Januar 2022 Zeit: ab 18:30 Uhr Ort: https://pub.digitale-gesellschaft.ch/b/pat-6h2-rqy Weitere Infos und (unverbindliche) Anmeldung: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Switzerland:Z%C3%BCrich/OSM-Treffen#… Gruss Packi

1 0

municipality mergers 2022
by Loremo 01 Jan '22

01 Jan '22

Dear Talk CH List The swiss openstreetmap community has its own "same procedure as every year" at new years eve. However it is not about Miss Sophie [1], but about our municipalities. We imported all official municipality borders a few years ago and since then we try to keep them up to date. I created a list of this years merges, you can find it in the wiki [2]. Anyone with enough josm know how is welcome to participate in the mergers, as long as you stick to the proposed work flow [3]. Please always check the effective field and do not start before! Loremo [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinner_for_One [2]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/2022_Municipality_Mergers [3]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Suggested_merger_workflow

2 1

Tagging of facilities for childcare in Switzerland
by Toggenburger Lukas 31 Dec '21

31 Dec '21

tl;dr: I seek advice for tagging different facilities for childcare in Switzerland. Dear list I got a waiver to import data from the city of Uster [1] and am in the process of preparing this data for an import. Before discussing the specifics of this import, I would like to clarify some general questions regarding Switzerland-specific tagging of places for childcare that came up while working with this dataset. Regarding childcare I would like to be able to tag the following use-cases, which I believe should cover the most common cases we have in Switzerland: - A: (what I call "Kindergarten" in german): Part of the mandatory swiss school education for children of the age of approx. 4 to 6. - B: ("Kita"): Where working parents can bring their children (approx. aged 0 to 4) during office hours (up to 5 full days a week). There is a definition at [2] that defines a Kita/use-case B as: Cares periodically for children aged 3 months until the age where compulsory school ends, on at least 5 half-days, offering 6 or more slots. - C: ("Spielgruppe"): Where children go approx. once per week for only a few hours. The legal hurdles to operate such a facility are lower than those for use-case B, but seem to differ for each canton. Food/lunch is normally not offered. - D: ("Hort"): Where children of age approx. 4+ go before/between/after mandatory school visits, so parents can work. - E: ("Krabbelgruppe"): A place where parents together with their children (aged approx. 0 to 2) meet regularly (e.g. once per week) for a small number of hours. I have a bit of a hard time mapping the existing Wiki entries to the above use-cases. My understanding (mostly from [3]) is this: - A: amenity=kindergarten, preschool=yes, operator:type=public, min_age=4, max_age=6, isced:level:2011=0 - B: amenity=kindergarten, nursery=yes, operator:type=private, min_age=3 months, breakfast=yes, lunch=yes - C: amenity=kindergarten, operator:type=private, min_age=4 - D: amenity=kindergarten, after_school=yes, operator:type=private, min_age=4, - E: (seems undefined yet) What I don't like about it: - The tagging for these almost don't differ, although I expect that for parents looking for a form of childcare the differences are significant. Especially between use-case B and C there is almost no distinction. - amenity=kindergarten is used 2427 times in Switzerland [4]. There is a competing tag amenity=childcare that is used non-negligible 726 times [5] in Switzerland. Its meaning is unclear to me (see [6] and [7]) and it is mentioned in a rejected [8] and an abandoned [9] proposal. Please share your input on the following questions: - Have I missed a significant use-case for childcare? - Do you agree with my tagging for the aforementioned use-cases? - Do you see a good way how we could tag the difference between use-cases B and C? Is this already given by nursery=yes? Maybe tag their membership to either kibesuisse (use-case B) [10] or SSLV (use-case C) [11] (might not be given/known for all)? How to do so? Or define a tag playgroup=yes or CH:playgroup=yes? - Do you agree in deprecating and manually retagging amenity=childcare instances? - What would be the easiest way to get a list of all mappers that tagged amenity=childcare onto objects in Switzerland to invite them for input? - Shall I (we?) go to the tagging mailing list trying to get consensus for a tag for use-case E? What should it be? baby_crawling_group=yes ? - Do you know any public map that is already showing the given use-cases? - What have I missed or got wrong? Links: [1] https://github.com/GesellschaftStadtUster/kind-jugend-fam_angebote [2] https://www.sslv.ch/erlaeuterung-zur-definition.html [3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten [4] http://taginfo.osm.ch/tags/amenity=kindergarten [5] http://taginfo.osm.ch/tags/amenity=childcare [6] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dchildcare [7] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dchildcare [8] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare [9] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare2.0 [10] https://www.kibesuisse.ch/ [11] https://www.sslv.ch Best regards Lukas

2 4

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

talk-ch