[talk-ch] Corrupt buildings

Stefan Keller sfkeller at gmail.com
Wed Jul 25 09:41:12 CEST 2018


Hi Nelson

2018-07-25 8:29 GMT+02:00 _ dikkeknodel wrote:
> Something seems to have gone wrong with the redaction is my conclusion.

Indeed: https://osm.org/go/0CYTlJg8k--?way=317495841

Any explanations why?

:Stefan


2018-07-25 8:29 GMT+02:00 _ dikkeknodel <dikkeknodel at hotmail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I had a closer look at the naoliv’s redaction CS61021881.
>
>
>
> I see, many previously rectangular buildings have now become triangles or
> just an open L-shape.
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317495841
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317495891
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317487442
>
> etc.
>
>
>
> More complex shapes have also lost a node and became less complex with some
> very weird shapes.
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317487614
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317336799
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317336826
>
> etc.
>
>
>
> It is all over the place basically. If a look to the pre-redaction version
> of the buildings, they seem to be nicely rectangular.
>
>
>
> It also seems that the address data entered with CS60359203, CS60359697 and
> CS60359350 have been (mistakenly) redacted (the blue ones in achavi, tag
> change only). These CSs mention local knowledge as source and there is no
> mention in the changesets discussions of any problem.
>
>
>
> Something seems to have gone wrong with the redaction is my conclusion.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> dikkeknodel
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Van: talk-ch <talk-ch-bounces at openstreetmap.ch> namens marc marc
> <marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com>
> Verzonden: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 2:13:37 AM
> Aan: talk-ch at openstreetmap.ch
> Onderwerp: Re: [talk-ch] Corrupt buildings
>
> witch building in this changeset is corrupt after naoliv change
> and not before ?
>
> Le 25. 07. 18 à 01:26, Kt47uo5uVzW a écrit :
>> Check this: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61021881
>>
>> No I'm not involved in any kind of this import/region.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> marc marc:
>>  > Hello,
>>  >
>>  > Le 25. 07. 18 à 00:25, Kt47uo5uVzW a écrit :
>>  >> I think the latest changesets from user 'naoliv' are erroneous.
>>  >> Can somewhere check and maybe revert this? Thanks.
>>  >
>>  > can you give an exemple ?
>>  > naoliv redact (hidde) data copied from Fribourg cadastre
>>  > (the licence of the canton of Fribourg doesn't allow it).
>>  > so a building should not be corrupted by this redact
>>  > but it should be already corrupt before.
>>  >
>>  > are you the guy that did the import ?
>>  >
>>  > Regards,
>>  > Marc
>>  > _______________________________________________
>>  > talk-ch mailing list
>>  > talk-ch at openstreetmap.ch <mailto:talk-ch at openstreetmap.ch>
>>  > http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
>>  >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk-ch mailing list
>> talk-ch at openstreetmap.ch
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk-ch mailing list
> talk-ch at openstreetmap.ch
> http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk-ch mailing list
> talk-ch at openstreetmap.ch
> http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
>


More information about the talk-ch mailing list