[talk-ch] Larger removal of street and place names derived from the GWR
simon at poole.ch
Sun Aug 13 23:08:38 CEST 2017
I'll take this up with Frederik asap, right now a number of relevant
people are in Japan so things are a bit difficult and I can't check
redacted changesets in a simple way either.
Am 13.08.2017 um 21:09 schrieb marc marc:
> Le 13. 08. 17 à 15:07, Simon Poole a écrit :
>> Am 13.08.2017 um 14:55 schrieb marc marc:
>>> In Domdidier half of the roads are involved at least partly.
>>> 3/5 of the affected road with a wrong name have been survey by myself
>>> AFTER the problematic import. so I suppose that survey changeset done
>>> after the import are not taken into account.
>> Could you give an example?
> road Vy-d'Avenches
> this part have been reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237594016
> hidden v3 seems to be mine done by survey in
> You can see the correct typo (a "-" missing) in changeset comment, in
> addr:street on building and also in another part of this road that
> doesn't have been reverted
> version #8 of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128523419/history
> another affected part of the same road
> hidden v6 seems to be mine done by survey in
>> we may be able to fix this up automatically if the reason is clear.
> I have the local knowledge and working to fix all affected street in
> Domdidier and can survey for typos.
> But I think that changesets made by DWG need to be review/improve
> because if I found many surveyed datas lost in this village, it is
> likely that it also happen at the country scale.
> Let me know if you want I freeze my fix while you're talking with DWG (I
> got no reply to the message I wrote to him a few days ago).
> talk-ch mailing list
> talk-ch at openstreetmap.ch
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the talk-ch