[talk-ch] Baselland bus/tram mixup
lonvia at denofr.de
Fri Oct 22 09:20:51 CEST 2010
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:24:15PM +0200, datendelphin wrote:
> Hi Andrew
> Usually, the algorithm considers bus and tram the same type. This is
> because in most places, didok does not make a difference between bus
> stops and tram stops. But Basel seems the exception. I will make an
> exception for the matching, that "BLT Auto" will only match bus stops.
> But it won't work in most places, because I "group" the OSM stops before
> I make the matching. And I can't make the exception for the grouping,
> because OSM stops seldom have an operator entry. It would need a very
> different algorithm to handle just this exception, so I say we make it
> by hand.
That worked well. Unfortunally, it seems that the data in Basel is
especially inconsistent. Have a look here at Luzernerring:
It seems that when BLT Auto (a bus) and BVB (a tram) share a stop
there is only one entry. I really don't see any way to fix Basel up
automatically. I've corrected a few obvious mistakes but it would really
help if somebody from Basel could check (and potentially fix) all stops
along the tram lines.
> On 19.10.2010 19:00, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Hi Folks
> > It seems there has been a mix up in Baselland with buses and trams.
> > e.g.
> > http://osm.lonvia.de/didok.html?zoom=17&lat=47.493&lon=7.58992&layers=BT
> > The BLT Auto point has been connected to the OSM tram stop, and the
> > BLT point has been left disconnected.
> > same as:
> > http://osm.lonvia.de/didok.html?zoom=17&lat=47.50137&lon=7.61946&layers=BT
> > etc.
> > Is it possible to globally change BLT auto to type bus and re-run the
> > matching algorithm?
> > Thanks
> > Andrew
> > _______________________________________________
> > talk-ch mailing list
> > talk-ch at openstreetmap.ch
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
> talk-ch mailing list
> talk-ch at openstreetmap.ch
More information about the talk-ch