They have done similar undiscussed address imports before in at least Martigny (https://www.osm.org/changeset/114924741). This also had many similar issues that were fixed only when pointed out to them, but I occasionally still spot others. I had asked them to announce future imports on the mailing list, so I think a revert is fine.

Best,

Eginhard

On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 5:35 PM RB <tanrub@gmail.com> wrote:

With this edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121562483#map=17/46.25232/6.93687 , thousands of addresses have been duplicated over existing well tagged buildings and entrances. I have commented the edit but what would be the correct thing to do should the author not revert this edit?

I am also concerned that the same person might do similar things in other areas.

_______________________________________________
talk-ch mailing list
talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch
http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch

_______________________________________________
talk-ch mailing list
talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch
http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch