This would seem to be a clear case for a revert, I'll do it (likely this
evening) if nobody else volunteers.

Besides the specific issues with this import, as has been pointed out
before, the GWR is a very useful  resource but needs to be used with
care and awareness that the data quality varies a lot.

Simon

Am 28.05.2022 um 17:35 schrieb RB:
> With this edit:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121562483#map=17/46.25232/6.93687
> , thousands of addresses have been duplicated over existing well
> tagged buildings and entrances. I have commented the edit but what
> would be the correct thing to do should the author not revert this edit?
>
> I am also concerned that the same person might do similar things in
> other areas.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk-ch mailing list
> talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch
> http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
_______________________________________________
talk-ch mailing list
talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch
http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch