Herzlichen Dank für die Aktualisierung.
Wenn man die Ebene mit "wrong uic_name for didok id" einblendet kann man gleich eine Geschichtsreise unternehmen. :D
Die Aufhebung von zahlreichen Poststellen hat zur Folge das wesentlich mehr Haltenstellen "Dorf" heissen.
Dann kann man auch sehen dass einzelne Kantone von Mundart auf Schriftsprache bei Haltestellenbezeichnungen wechseln und umgekehrt.
Oder dass Haltestellen die einmal nach Firmennamen bezeichnet wurden eine "neutrale" Bezeichnung erhielten. (das gäbe Diskusionsstoff für dieses Trauerspiel : http://www.20min.ch/schweiz/zentralschweiz/story/12894562).
Auf jeden Fall gibt mir diese Aktualisierung wieder ein wenig Arbeit um die gröbsten Fehler in der Umgebung zu korrigieren.
 
Viele Grüsse
 
Hubert
 

 

Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. August 2014 um 21:38 Uhr
Von: "Michael Spreng" <mailinglist@osm.datendelphin.net>
An: "Openstreetmap Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera/Svizra" <talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch>
Betreff: [talk-ch] update public transport stops
Hello

I imported the newest dataset of public transport stops from the BAV
(Bundesamt für Verkehr), known as DIDOK list, into our comparison tool
at didok.osm.ch

I had a look at the stops where DIDOK and OSM disagree the most in
location (the stops where we have the largest distance between the OSM
coordinates and the DIDOK coordinates)
http://didok.osm.ch/#sw:9:46.903369:8.316650
And I made a few corrections to OSM data. Mostly there were issues with
OSM having a wrong uic_ref number attached to the stop.

For a few stops it seems the DIDOK data has improved, and we still have
the old DIDOK data which was imported in 2009 and was a few kilometres
off. But it seems there is no big potential for automated edits, this is
best done manually. I have found some stops where the new location is at
least as questionable as the old one (example
http://didok.osm.ch/#sc:14:47.491631:8.254766 The new DIDOK coordinates
are on the SW end of the black line. But to me it looks like
"Ennetturgi" is rather on the NE end)

Over all I think DIDOK has improved a bit, but there are still lots of
funny errors in it. For example here:
http://didok.osm.ch/#sc:14:47.491631:8.254766 they mixed up Gonten and
Gontenbad :) Too bad we couldn't motivate them to use OSM to check their
data.

I will follow up with one or two other DIDOK related topics in the next
few weeks. In the mean time please keep using our public transport check
tool. There are still lots of unchecked bus stops
(http://didok.osm.ch/#sc:14:47.491631:8.254766 the red circles) which
are potentially totally wrong data from DIDOK.

Have a nice week
Michael
_______________________________________________
talk-ch mailing list
talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch
http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch