Dear Markus,

I agree it is clearer and will make that amendment and make sure it is the same in the French version which we will publish in the next days. No one should feel the need to be inventive.

Is giving a descriptive name really not best practice in some circumstances?  For example if I invent a name for a fountain "St Restitut Church fountain", is this incorrect ? 

Best regards,

Stuart 


On Sat, 21 Dec 2019, 13:18 Markus, <selfishseahorse@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Stuart!

Thanks for adding amenity=fountain to the documentation. I would also change

  name = "the name you choose"

to

  name = "name of the fountain" (if any)

or similar, because "the name you choose" may lead people to add a
description (e.g. "Drinking fountain" or "Old fountain on the main
square in Watertown") instead of the fountain name, if it has one.
(For descriptions, the key description is used. If the fountain has no
name, noname=yes can be added.)

Best regards

Markus


On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 18:07, European Water Project
<europeanwaterproject@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Markus and Simon,
>
> We have had many non-technical people read the instructions and have reworked them significantly to make them more legible to individuals who have no knowledge of OSM or Wikimedia Commons. I am sure we will have to continue to improve them further.
>
> If either of you have the energy to review them again, I would greatly appreciate it.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Stuart
>
> On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 at 22:31, European Water Project <europeanwaterproject@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Markus,
>>
>> Based on your suggestion, we will suggest when adding a drinking fountains to for them to be tagged either 1) as amenity = drinking_water or 2 ) with two tags a) amenity = fountain and b) drinking_water = yes.
>>
>> And for section 3) we will suggest that for editing a water fountain that does not seem to have drinking quality water that the fountain should be designated with two tags a) amenity = fountain and b) drinking_water = no.
>>
>> Thank you for your comments,
>>
>> Stuart
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 15 Dec 2019, 22:05 Markus, <selfishseahorse@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Stuart!
>>>
>>> On the Wikimedia page you suggest adding drinking_water=yes to a
>>> drinking fountain (amenity=drinking_water). However, this is redundant
>>> as amenity=drinking_water already implies drinking_water=yes. [1]
>>>
>>> [1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water
>>>
>>> By the way, you may also be interested in mapping amenity=fountain,
>>> i.e. decorative fountains, [2] as they often provide drinkable water
>>> too. Note that for amenity=fountain it makes sense to add
>>> drinking_water=yes/no.
>>>
>>> [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfountain
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Markus
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> talk-ch mailing list
>>> talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk-ch mailing list
> talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch
> http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
_______________________________________________
talk-ch mailing list
talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch
http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch