Giving a hand wavy statement of intent without providing concrete examples of issues and how you intend to resolve them is not acceptable. Even less so given that the (template) wiki page does not contain any useful infomation and is just a circular reference to itself.

And just the fact that you are not listing any acceptable sources from a quality pov for the country is enought to request preemptive blocks on all mapbox employees.

Simon

Hello from the Mapbox Team!
In April 2022 our team is going to start a mapping project in Switzerland.
As part of on-going work to improve the quality of OpenStreetMap data, our
team is planning to review a subset of the detections to better understand
the type of issues, and also fix any valid data issues directly in the OSM.
Where concentrating on road mistakes to improve map condition. In Switzerland
we plan to upload data once a week to see and fix the latest mistakes in
mapping after reviewing the 1st iteration.
We would really appreciate your feedback, any questions you have about this
project, as well as local insights that you think will help us better
understand the data.
There's a link to our Github ticket
<https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/407> to the related issue and a
link to our page in OSM Wiki
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/resolve_linting_issues_in_Switzerland>.


Best regards,
Member of Mapbox team,
Sergey

_______________________________________________
talk-ch mailing list
talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch
http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch