[talk-ch] vandalism under the pretense of "simplifying"

David Haberthür email at davidhaberthuer.ch
Wed Jun 29 08:34:41 CEST 2022

Ciao a tutti

> On 28 Jun 2022, at 22:19, RB <tanrub at gmail.com> wrote:
> Altering the data and regressing from the truth with automated tools because of personal opinions of what the data should be or not be is not.

I really don’t know if the original issue is a regression or digression, but I would not imply vandalism and bad intention of the user that simplified your/the forest outlines.

As already said, it’s probably best to discuss this directly in the relevant changeset, too.

Have a great day,

More information about the talk-ch mailing list