[talk-ch] Draft changes for the hiking network wiki page

Raphaël Terrettaz r.terrettaz at gmail.com
Wed Sep 22 21:29:55 CEST 2021


Oui je suis d'accord avec Yves, une relation de plus de 150 membres n'est
pas gérable. Par contre ça m'a permis de répertorier rapidement tous les
chemins pédestre que j'empruntais, sans que je sache forcément leur origine
ou destination ! De plus je ne voyais pas d'utilisation de ces données
précises dans OSM.

S'il y a une nouvelle façon standard de carthographier ces chemins, avec ce
que j'ai déjà reconnu ce sera simple de créer de nouvelles relations !

Et, je me demande, est-ce que des contacts ont déjà été pris avec
http://www.yway.ch/ ? C'est une base impressionnante de poteau indicateurs,
cela permettrait d'ajouter rapidement tous ceux qu'il manque encore.

Raphaël Terrettaz


<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Garanti
sans virus. www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 22:23, Yves <ycai at mailbox.org> a écrit :

> Une relation de 160 membres pour collectionner les chemins d'une même
> commune ? Cela ne va pas faire que des heureux.... Pourquoi pas un tag
> operator= ou maintained_by= ou autre ?
>
> A 160 members relation collecting de trails on a same village ? Some may
> disagree... Why not an operator= or maintened_by= tag or else?
>
> Yves
>
> Le 19 septembre 2021 21:59:24 GMT+02:00, "Raphaël Terrettaz" <
> r.terrettaz at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>> *English text below (Google translate)*
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Merci pour cette proposition ! Je carthographie le réseau pédestre depuis
>> plusieurs années et je suis convaicu de l'intérêt d'avoir ces données dans
>> OpenStreetMap !
>>
>> Dans ma région j'ai carthographié les chemins pédestres d'une autre façon
>> encore. Comme je sais que les chemins sont entretenus par les communes,
>> j'ai créé une relation par commune. Cette relation regroupe tous les
>> chemins de cette commune, ceci afin de ne pas avoir trop de relations, ou
>> des chemins qui sont dans plusieurs relations.
>>
>> Par exemple pour la commune d'Orsières :
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1067491
>>
>> Ou celle de Sembrancher :
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1589286
>>
>> J'espère que ce commentaire pourra vous être utile !
>>
>> Meilleures salutations
>> Raphaël Terrettaz
>>
>> -----------
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thank you for this proposal! I have been mapping the hiking network for
>> several years and I am convinced of the interest of having this data in
>> OpenStreetMap!
>>
>> In my region I have mapped the hiking trails in another way. As I know
>> that the paths are maintained by the municipalities, I created a
>> relationship per municipality. This relation regroups all the paths of this
>> municipality, in order to have a reduced number of relations, or paths in
>> several relations.
>>
>> For example for Orsières:
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1067491
>>
>> Or for Sembrancher:
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1589286
>>
>> Hope this comment can be useful to you!
>>
>> Best regards
>> Raphaël Terrettaz
>>
>>
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Garanti
>> sans virus. www.avast.com
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>> <#m_5791829846175558290_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>
>> Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 15:02, René Buffat <buffat at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> Dear All
>>>
>>>
>>> Since after the online meeting a while ago I tried to formulate a draft
>>> based on the discussions on the mailing list / the meeting. Due to lack of
>>> time and energy, this took unfortunately a lot longer than I initially
>>> thought.
>>>
>>>
>>> The current draft can be found here
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RIn4vOpPggEzJOv9AMl1egxzeMLpkgxF0q8nWuFhUaE/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I can't send the PDF version (for people that do not want
>>> to access a google server) to the mailing list, as it is too big. But I'm
>>> open to suggestions for alternatives.
>>>
>>>
>>> If you like, please create comments directly in the document or reply to
>>> this email when you have feedback. The idea would be to collect all
>>> discussion points at the bottom of the document and mark the discussed
>>> parts of the document with comments.
>>>
>>>
>>> When writing the draft, I had the following thoughts:
>>>
>>>    -  It would be could to include some background information about
>>>    the Swiss hiking network as this could give some context for the rest of
>>>    the document and might facilitate discussions about the topic.
>>>    - There are different opinions on what level of detail the hiking
>>>    network should be mapped. It is thus important to clearly state a minimal
>>>    goal but also allow some flexibility.
>>>    - Changes to the wiki page should not contradict existing mapped
>>>    relations, except there are good reasons for it (such as e.g. the issue
>>>    with using name tags for relations that clash with nominatim)
>>>    - Figures are sometimes better to explain things than text.
>>>    - For some regions, open datasets exist that contain the hiking
>>>    network but no information about guideposts. These datasets should be
>>>    usable.
>>>
>>>
>>> lg rene
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> talk-ch mailing list
>>> talk-ch at openstreetmap.ch
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/pipermail/talk-ch/attachments/20210922/785ae30d/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the talk-ch mailing list