[talk-ch] boundary and river node merge

Frédéric Junod frederic.junod at gmail.com
Fri Aug 3 13:14:18 CEST 2012


On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:
> Please DON'T merge, in fact please do not merge ANYTHING with
> boundaries from the SwissTopo import.
>
> Reasons:
>
> - boundaries tend to be historic and mostly reflect old river beds,
> roads etc.
>
> - the SwissTopo data was simplified on import
>
> - merging the data increases the probability of editing errors impacting
> the boundaries by a gigantic amount
>

It makes good sense.
Thanks for the input.

fredj

> Simon
>
> Am 03.08.2012 11:04, schrieb Frédéric Junod:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> http://osm.org/go/0CSYTVpk
>>
>> In this area, the boundary (Cossonay) and the river (La Venoge) share
>> the same location.
>>
>> Would be correct to merge the nodes in this section? (they are
>> strongly related)
>> Or align the nodes without a merge, or do nothing ...
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> fredj
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk-ch mailing list
>> talk-ch at openstreetmap.ch
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk-ch mailing list
> talk-ch at openstreetmap.ch
> http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch



More information about the talk-ch mailing list