Guten abig,
I was looking at the data for Luzern Bahnhof. I noticed some weird polygons, but maybe it is expected, maybe it is wrong. Can someone share their opinion?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1280137373 - this looks to be the same as the outer way of the multipolygon above. But this is not a child member of the multipolygon, and has sparse other tags.
is the way a duplicate of the relation? Or should these really both exist separately?
A secondary question: we have the railway station as a node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2051794005 - should the relation and way above be named Bahnhof Luzern, considering the node is named Luzern, or should the relation and way just have no name, as train station buildings but not the representative "point of interest" that has a name?
Thank you for your opinions on this and I look forward to learning what is the best practice!
Freundliche gruesse,
Christopher Beddow
_______________________________________________